Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

While riding in the bike lane on a four lane street in Northern California, a car passed me on my left, stopped in the right-hand lane twenty to thirty feet ahead of me, and signaled to turn right into a parking lot driveway.

Who has the right of way in this situation? Am I required to stop in the bike lane and let the car turn across my lane, or is the car required to wait until it is safe to turn?

Note: I'm specifically asking about California law but encourage answers for all jurisdictions. While safety and biking defensively is important, my question is only concerned with the law. There is a similar question regarding cars turning right at an intersection, but none of the answers address driveways.

share|improve this question
As noted below, he's effectively making a right turn from a lane other than the far-right lane -- illegal in virtually all jurisdictions. – Daniel R Hicks Sep 13 '12 at 23:07
As a matter of legality, in every jurisdiction I am aware of, the motorist is at fault in this kind of accident. As a matter of practicality and safety, I don't care who is at fault. I just want to avoid the accident. Yielding to a turning automobile is smarter than asserting your right to blame them when they hit you. – zenbike Sep 14 '12 at 3:28
I agree with @zenbike. It doesn't matter who's right in the case, because the cyclist always loses. Unless you are very sure that the car sees you and is going to wait before turning in front of you, you should probably assume that they are going to turn in front of you, and act accordingly. – Kibbee Sep 14 '12 at 13:55
If you were in a car behind a semi-trailer that was signalling a wide right turn would you try and sneak down the right while he turns? No... you would change lanes and pass him on the left or wait for him to complete his right turn. Why should it be any different just because you're on a bike? Bike lanes confuse motorists because they know they shouldn't be driving in them yet drivers haven't been fully informed how to deal with them when attempting to cross them. Think about when the majority of drivers wrote their road tests and then ask how long bike lanes have been around. – Chef Flambe Sep 17 '12 at 18:50
up vote 19 down vote accepted

California Vehicle Code section 21717: Turning Across Bicycle Lane states that cars are required to enter the bike lane before turning.

Whenever it is necessary for the driver of a motor vehicle to cross a bicycle lane that is adjacent to his lane of travel to make a turn, the driver shall drive the motor vehicle into the bicycle lane prior to making the turn and shall make the turn pursuant to Section 22100.

share|improve this answer

Regardless of who has legal right of way, Toronto tells cyclists to avoid passing cars on the right, and especially when the car might turn right.

enter image description here

Car-bike collisions and tips to avoid them

share|improve this answer

In Australia at least, a cyclist in a bike lane has right of way over a car which is crossing the bike lane:

Coloured bicycle lanes at intersections are to remind motorists that this section of the roadway is a travel lane for bicycle riders. The marking highlights the existence of the ‘bicycle lane’ to motorists and the ‘right of way’ legally provided to the cyclist by a ‘bicycle lane’. Therefore, where you see a bicycle lane and particularly a green coloured area at an intersection, be on the lookout for cyclists. If a cyclist is in the bicycle lane, motorists must give way. - page 31

I think this includes both cars turning on the intersection or entering driveways.


75 Giving way when entering a road-related area or adjacent land from a road ($114 fine)

(1) A driver entering a road-related area or adjacent land from a place on a road without traffic lights or a stop sign, stop line, give way sign or give way line must give way to:

(a) any pedestrian on the road; and

(b) any vehicle or pedestrian on any road-related area that the driver crosses or enters; and

(c) if the driver is turning right from the road - any oncoming vehicle on the road that is going straight ahead or turning left;

(d) if the road the driver is leaving ends at a T-intersection opposite the road-related area or adjacent land and the driver is crossing the continuing road - any vehicle on the continuing road.

Which means you'd have a right of way even if you were wheeling your bike on the footpath (or riding on the footpath where it is legal).

share|improve this answer
Note: Australia drive on the left... ''(c) if the driver is turning right'... now makes sense to everyone. – mattnz Sep 13 '12 at 23:38
The question is specifically about California law. – Carey Gregory Sep 14 '12 at 0:26
To quote: "I'm specifically asking about California law but encourage answers for all jurisdictions." – Sergey Sep 14 '12 at 1:17

The question was specifically about legality. The cyclist has the right of way in Oregon, whether there is a dedicated bike lane or not, as long as the cyclist is on the far right of the road. I believe the same is true in California. My answer is about a car turning into a driveway, residential or a business, not about turns at a light.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.