Tell me more ×
Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 5 down vote favorite

I have seen more and more reference to the 650b (27.5") mtb wheel size. Whilst I don't see any need for a new standard, does anyone know of any benefit to have a 27.5" wheel over a 26" or 29"?

While I understand there are currently 650b specific frames and wheels I haven't seen forks yet.

Also can someone please make a 650b tag, I don't have the rep yet. Thanks.

share|improve this question
1  
You gotta clean this up to be more specific. Currently your asking if pears are better than apples or oranges. This question is so general that the only way to directly answer it is with pure opinion. – jm2 Jan 18 at 1:56

4 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

You might want to take a look a this question which discusses the advantages of 29" over 26".

650b (or 27.5") falls somewhere in the middle and therefore performance characteristics will be somewhere in the middle of the two. For instance, 650b would be faster than 26" but slower than 29" at same chainring/cog. It would also roll over obstacles easier than a 26" but not as well as a 29". Also, the weight would be somewhere in the middle.

It depends on what type of riding you are doing to determine which is the "better" platform. Also, you should consider how easy it is to find parts in your area for a particular wheel. Since 650b is only starting to gain popularity, it might be difficult for you to find the tires you want, or to find replacement tubes at your local bike store. Also, I'm pretty sure you have to have a completely different frame for all 3 options, as tires aren't really interchangeable at that large of a difference. You could possibly put smaller tires on the frame than it is designed for, if you had disc brakes, but it might look odd, and might have weird handling.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

Pinkbike recently did a little opinion piece it. To summarise they thought 29ers were better for open, fast XC; whilst the 26" dominated in downhill, technical sections. 650b (27.5") were considered to be poor in either domain, and not particularly liked by any of the 3 testers.

But remember it's all opinion and it really depends on what you do with a bike.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

I know you tagged your question as "mountain bike", but there is also some interest in 650b for road bikes.

Jan Heine of Bicycling Quarterly is keen on wide 650b tyres for comfort without loss of speed.

...we chose 650B because it offers the best handling with wide tires.

The other reason you'd want 650b on a road bike is if you're a smaller rider (say 5ft 5in or less), or you're keen on very low trail. In these situations, slightly smaller wheels fit a smaller frame better, when 700C wheels might result in toe-overlap or uncomfortable geometries. The details are explained here.

The downside is that 650b tyres are harder to find, especially for road bikes.

share|improve this answer
up vote 0 down vote

I went from a 26 to a 29, you can go faster and the is more efficient, your wheel takes longer to turn the bigger it is making you produce less work. I would go with the 29, I love mine!

share|improve this answer
Bigger wheels are not inherently faster any more than a larger gear is faster. The wheel size you choose ought to be determined by what best fits your frame, which should, in turn, fit you. If you're a big guy then 29" may well suit you/your bike better. See this: rodbikes.com/articles/toeoverlap.html – JamesBradbury Jan 18 at 10:05
In addition to @JamesBradbury: Things like the change of wheel size will never have just advantages without any disadvantage. Therefore every solution you choose will be a trade-off between improvements and drawbacks. Maybe 29" was a good choice for you as the advantages overweight or you do not consider the drawbacks to be drawbacks at all. Someone else maybe will see this exactly the other way round. To be polemic: why, according to your arguments, don't all the BMX racers go on 29" if it's that more efficient? – Benedikt Bauer Jan 18 at 12:43
You are so right, disregard what I said. Ha. – Seth Urquhart Jan 18 at 16:13
@JamesBradbury "Bigger wheels are not inherently faster any more than a larger gear is faster." That isn't strictly true off-road, a larger diameter wheel allows it roll over rougher terrain without losing momentum as easily. The only reason it hasn't taken off for extremely rough terrain riding (Downhill) is that the wheels make the bikes handle less well, that's why 650b is marketed heavily for Enduro riders. – cmannett85 Jan 25 at 8:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.