Sign up ×
Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I came upon this marvelous explanation of headset types.

However, this got me wondering. Isn't the role of the headset cups similar to that of the derauler hanged - to not waste the frame as soon as some wear-outable components ends it's life? How do frames with integrated headsets survive more than several years?

enter image description here from

share|improve this question

6 Answers 6

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Here's an excerpt from Chris King about headset types:

What is an “Integrated” headset?

It is a bicycle frame, fork and bearing system designed to eliminate the humble headset cup. To integrate means to combine and hopefully to simplify. What has been “integrated” by the integrated headset? The bearings now rest inside the frame instead of inside pressed-in cups. All of this trouble and confusion is to remove two 12 gram headset cups from the front of your bicycle. True, an integrated headset can give the bike a nice, smooth looking front end, but the consequences of this change to your bicycle are significant.

Simply put, the performance and lifetime that you expect from your new bicycle will be reduced, most severely in aluminum mountain bikes. All bicycle frames that use integrated headsets will ultimately have substantial performance and reliability problems due to the inherent flaws in this design. The largest flaw is a bearing system that does not positively attach the bearing to the frame, leaving the bearing to “float” resulting in wear and impact damage to the frame.

As an additional complication, each manufacturer seems to be doing their own thing, with no real standardization to date. As a result, there are multiple bearing types and sizes (some of which have been discontinued with no replacement options) and the frame builders and bearing makers are not all working from the same drawings. Lack of standardization is a bad thing for everyone. It means that you may not be able to get replacement headset bearings for your bike, and you will need them.

So, to answer your question, yes, an integrated headset will eventually wear out, but that service time is dependent on riding type, style, number of hours, and quality/material of the frame.

You can read more about all three types: Integrated Headsets Explained

share|improve this answer
I'm not saying that I disagree, but it's probably worth noting that Chris King's business was built on traditional headsets. As a result, he's not exactly an impartial authority. – jimirings Jun 25 '14 at 23:06
This answer doesn't even try to address the question of whether the frame has to be discarded when the headset wears out. – Mσᶎ Jun 25 '14 at 23:15
@Mσᶎ While not explicit the answer does indeed: "leaving the bearing to “float” resulting in wear and impact damage to the frame." There's not a hard and fast rule for when a frame is "too worn out" to be used anymore. It will depend on riding style, miles, maintenance, weather, etc. – Aaron Jun 26 '14 at 13:00
Fully integrated headset is the antipattern when we are considering the technical side of things. It was designed and introduced only to reduce costs. Trek and other overgrown companies are reducing costs of production advertising lots of those "new" things as cutting edge and "better". Installing standard or semi integrated headset requires specialized tools, time and knowledge. Previously mentioned Trek doesn't know how to do those things. My Fuel Ex from 2008 had horribly installed standard headset (frame was not faced). If you want quality product buy frame with semi-integrated HS (Pivot). – goroncy Oct 13 '14 at 12:45
@jimirirings That's a good point for historical purposes. I'm think you know more than me, but fundamental questions will ensue now. How many miles do you ride a week and how are the roads? – miles2know Jun 22 at 2:10

It is true that integrated headsets can wiggle a fraction of a millimeter when properly installed, more if they're not adjusted correctly. For most bikes, the wear caused by a properly adjusted integrated headset is going to be trivial. Something else on the frame will likely fail before the bore for the cartridge bearing gets wallowed out. Keep in mind that the head tube is not the bearing race for an integrated headset- you're just dropping a cartridge bearing down into the head tube and with cartridge bearings the races are part of the package.

if you run your headset out of adjustment continuously you may wear some slop into an integrated headset, but running a headset too loose can cause damage to any headtube regardless of the headset it accepts.

one final point for clarification, installation for an integrated headset into the headtube does not require any special tools. Installation of a standard or internal headset into the headtube will require a headset press as they both use cups that must be pressed into place. Once the cups are in place replacing the bearings requires nothing more than a hex wrench to remove your stem and top cap with. Installation of a crown race will require a special tool (if you want to do it right) if it is not a split type race- split races go on with no special tools. For removal of any of the above,if it took a special tool to go on, it will take a special tool to come off. Yes, you can use a screwdriver if you don't mind gnarling up your components.

share|improve this answer
I have a Schwinn Mesa lt frame that I'm sure uses an internal headset, and as far as I remember the cups come of just by hand. Does this contradict part of your answer or is my frame busted? (I've been riding it for 5+ years during wich I have installed two forks on it) – Jahaziel Jun 25 '14 at 22:53

I'm pretty sure that the stress of changing worn-out press-fit cups does more damage to a head tube than the drop-in integrated variety.

Changing a set of cups on a frame is a high-stress, creaking, cracking job requiring dedicated tools with lots of mechanical advantage. If you don't use the right tools you need to use a hammering action, which is even worse for the frame!

Integrated headsets have never ruined a frame in all the years I've been working on them.

share|improve this answer
The necessity of specialized tools usage during disassembly does not mean that the semi integrated or standard headset design is worse. It just mean that you need specialized tools nothing more. And no. Changing a set of cups does not cause creaking, cracking or any other unpleasant noise. It is very simple and clean procedure. Next set of cups when installed correctly will work with no degradation of any kind compared to the previous setup. – goroncy Oct 13 '14 at 12:41

Integrated headsets use sealed cartridge bearings, so extra cups are superfluous as all of the moving parts are hidden away inside.

share|improve this answer

The image is wrong when it says you don't need special tools. There are special tools for both the installation and removal of integrated and internal headsets.

My point is that they are removable and replaceable. Having one wear out doesn't ruin the usefulness of a frame.

share|improve this answer
Do you agree with alex's answer? If no, please clarify further what tools and techniques are available for integrated headsets. I am curious to learn about headset maintenance. – Vorac Aug 15 '13 at 8:17
It sounds like you're saying that the cups are removable as well as the bearings. If so, could you provide references? Everything I've seen seems to indicate otherwise. – jimirings Jun 26 '14 at 15:55

I can see why Chris King would talk down on integrated headsets about being a flawed design since they first came out into the BMX scene,what,12 or 13 years ago?His business was based on the old cup design!Integrated headsets not only eliminated 1 or 2 grams of weight,which is really nothing,but also simplified assembly by a long shot.Who would still want to hammer their cups into their headtube when they can just slip the bearings into their heat treated headtube,cut installation into a fraction of the time and just ride away?A sport like BMX is all about evolution in all its forms and disciplines and he knows this.If he also made bottom brackets,would he say the same about when they went in BMX from American to Euro to Spanish and Mid?Probably,I'm pretty sure.But for example,each change in BMX technology as far as bearing development and application has improved tenfold since its introduction into the sport,and in every step along the way.Every company in the industry just joined and snowballed the evolution of the sport and the technology used to improve on things that were once flawed designs.Hell,my first integrated headset was a FSA Impact and I got it in 2005.Believe it or not,I'm still riding the crap out of it.Yes,to this day.It's been on 7 frames,ridden hard on each and every one of em and still laughing at me as it asks for more after each session.So definitely I'll be the first to say that it's not that much of a flawed design.Sorry Mr King,but you were wrong with your speculations about integrated headsets being brought into the sport.I'll agree to disagree...

share|improve this answer
Welcome to Bicycles! You may want to spend some time on the tour to get an idea of how Stack Exchange works – we encourage answers to questions supported by evidence. The idea is that we can learn from each other's experience and knowledge. It also helps to take care with formatting and grammar in your answers. Readability counts. – dlu Jul 25 at 16:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.