I wanted to buy a Wilier Triestina Izoard XP. The dealer told me that the Izoard XP 2013 with Shimano 105 cost 3021$ and I would have sold discounted to 2060$. The same price of the Izoard XP 2014 with 105. I asked why the new model would cost the same amount of discounted old model and he told me that the fork of the 2013 better than the 2014. I don't understand from Izoard XP 2014 spec if it is better then Izoard XP 2013 see english 'Bike Specification' in this italian site. Is a matter of fork?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Annual improvements in bikes tend to small and incremental. They have been doing this for over 100 years, unless someone comes out with something revolutionary, its hard to see how they can make a big difference. If it is revolutionary, it won't be the same model name (and it wont be 105).
For me, a grand in the wallet makes the 2013 a better bike. In a year, the 2014 will be a grand cheaper and in two years the same price on the second hand market as the 2013. If I wanted to spend $3000, I would buy the 2013 model of a $4500 bike.
Only you can decide if small incremental improvements are worth the money to you.
I have the 2013' it's awesome. The 2014 looks cheaper because of cheaper parts (1/2 tiagra) and wheels. Get the 2013. Anything less than 105 groupset doesn't do the frame justice. Get the 2013 Upgrade the tyres day 1 and the wheels down the track.