Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have been looking at the Scott SUB 2014 as a potential candidate for my cycle to Paris (approx 90 miles) and a cycle across the South Downs this summer.

Having such different terrains, I was wondering if anyone has any insight as to the quality of Scott bikes (never owned one before) and suggestions as to if you think this bike would be fit for purpose.

Would love to hear your thoughts, full spec can be found here.

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by jimirings, Benzo, joelmdev, Neil Fein, freiheit Mar 13 '14 at 23:48

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Scott is a fine brand. The most important thing is how it rides and fits for you (this is a highly personal decision on your end).

For a 90 mile ride though, you may want something with drops (with a relaxed geometry - something like a Trek 520 wouldn't be bad for this purpose, for example) or a flat bar with bar ends or a trekking bar or something for multiple hand positions if you're taking the 90 miles in essentially 1 or 2 shots. However, I'm not familiar with the particular European terrain, so I'll defer to the Europeans.

share|improve this answer

I think that bike would make a good choice if buying new. It is towards the higher end of the price scale for hybrids and you would be getting some quality Shimano parts for your money. I think it would be possible to spend less money and get just as suitable a bike, if you have another reason for liking the Scott (perhaps its looks or future use) then I'd say go for it. Otherwise, have a bit more of a dig around and compare as many manufacturers and models as you can, you may be able to save a few hundred pounds which could be spent on a helmet, some cycle-specific clothing (not necessarily lycra!), a decent lock or other accessories. Regardless, the Scott seems to be a quality bicycle from a respected manufacturer.

It seems to be set up for road and light off-road, sold as a rough tourer or "expedition" ride. The South Downs Way is very hilly, with many short sharp inclines whilst the road to Paris (from Calais or Dieppe) is relatively flat. The road surfaces are very different too, the South Downs Way being rocky with patches of loose chalk and few paved roads of any distance whilst the road to Paris is paved or tow-path style. If I were using this bike I would get a set of larger, more knobbly tyres to cope with off-road duties.

I would expect you to have little trouble completing your ride to Paris in one day, it will certainly be an effort if you're not used to distance riding. In comparison, I would expect only a very hardy cyclist on a dedicated MTB to complete a similar distance on the South Downs Way in that time.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.