Sign up ×
Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I clean my chain on the bicycle, mostly because taking it off for a bath, drying, etc seems to take more time than I have. But maybe I could use 2 chains in rotation, I would take one chain off, replace it with second clean one, and during the days that follow would slowly clean it to be ready for next cycle.

Are there any drawbacks to such approach regarding the wear of cogs, or something else?

share|improve this question
What you're saying sounds fine, just wondered if you ever take the cassette off to clean, and how that would fit in? – PeteH Apr 28 '14 at 12:39
Cassette seems simpler to clean, so I usually clean it on the bicycle. – Davorin Ruševljan Apr 29 '14 at 8:11

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

There is actually a real gain from this strategy. By rotating 2 (or 3) chains you extend the life of rear cogs (cassette) and it will last all your chains. In case you use one chain, you may need to replace cassette together with chain.

As of front cogs, they last longer, but you will get a more even wear.

Speaking of drawbacks - regularly taking off your chain you can make your PowerLink (or other brand) a bit more loose and have a higher risk of it failing under a load.

share|improve this answer
+1 Wise words. However, I fer this could grow into the "I will leave the dishes in the sink to soak and will wash them tomorrow ... aaand it's 3 months later, no clean dishes at home". – Vorac Apr 28 '14 at 13:01
Note that some chain locks are not designed to be reopened, and using a new lock every time the chain is cleaned will get expensive very fast. – arne Apr 28 '14 at 14:05
@arne yes, but re-usable ones are pretty cheap - SRAM Powerlink three packs are about $7 online, so a little over $2 a set. – Nuі Apr 29 '14 at 22:59
I'm a bit confused by the 'real gain' you refer to in the first paragraph. Are you saying that nominal life of cassette = 2 x nominal life of chain? Or that having swapping the chains frequently somehow gets less wear on the cassette? Or something else? – oals Oct 17 at 13:53
@oals It's them both: Nominal life of cassette is about 2 or 3 times nominal chain life. You gain even more if you use 3 chains because: if you use 1 chain, when it wears off, it wears the cassette much more, then you put second chain, and the new chain gets wear faster because the cassette is already a bit worn, then your cassette and all the chains after the first one lasts much faster. And there are cases when putting new chain on a cassette will wear the cassette to the end because of the difference in wears. – Alexander Oct 18 at 4:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.