Take the 2-minute tour ×
Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've always used a lock nut with a presta valve, but I know others who don't use it and leave the valve stem to protrude through the rim hole without fastening.

What, if any, are the advantages of not using a locking nut for a presta valve?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The advantage is that it's quicker and easier to get the tube out and tyre off, and you never have to deal with jammed nuts. IME the nut will be wedged unbelievably tight the one time you get a puncture at an inconvenient moment, and you'll end up breaking the valve (if you have pliers) or not being able to get at the hole (if you don't). The problem there is that you do the nut up firmly when the tube is inflated to 100psi, then it goes flat and without the air pressure "firmly" becomes "OMG".

The fix for that over-tight nut is obviously to inflate the tube. Which is fine if there's a wee hole somewhere away from the valve, but if the tube burst or you brought a spare tube instead of a patch kit you just have to somehow get the value out of the tyre. Which is surprisingly hard to do if the only tools you have to hand are whatever is on the side of the road.

The nut is slightly useful if you have a flat-section rim drilled for schrader values, in that it stops sand and muck getting in through the gap between the valve and the rim and rattling round in a hollow rim or causing punctures. And it can make putting a loose tyre back on by holding the bead in place by the valve while you try to balance the bead around the rim so it doesn't blow off. But a properly fitting tyre doesn't do that.

The other 99% of the time the nut does nothing harmful. Nothing very useful either. It's just there.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 - it's just there! –  PeteH Aug 18 at 9:30
2  
But if you only do the nut up finger tight in the first place, before the tube is hard, you gain the benefit without the risk. My schrader tubes have nuts now as well and it does make getting inflation started easier (probably even more so than on the prestas). –  Chris H Aug 18 at 13:10
    
It adds more weight to the valve which in turn might cause the wheel to become dynamically more unbalanced. Especially at higher speeds –  Carel Aug 18 at 14:37
    
Personally, destroyed tubes from poor "pump attachment": three. Jammed nuts: zero. –  tedder42 Aug 19 at 22:47
1  
@Mσᶎ I don't think it warrants a full answer- it doesn't quite answer the original question- but my experience is that a tight nut significantly reduces motion of the valvestem. –  tedder42 Aug 20 at 3:20

I prefer having the nut, because it makes pumping much easier, especially road side with a frame pump. I put them on finger tight and then retighten after inflating, and I've never had one jam, or rattle.

share|improve this answer
    
Yea, and putting the nut on makes fitting the tube and then tire easier. Without the nut one needs to be careful not to move rotate the tube while fitting, this removing the valve from the valve hole. –  Vorac Aug 18 at 12:39
    
@Vorac However, if you use the nut, you'll need to have the tubes powdered with talcum or some such to further prevent them from moving. Otherwise, the tubes may stick to the tires and move during a hard stop, ripping the valve out in the process. Very annoying, especially if you don't carry a spare. –  arne Aug 18 at 13:16
7  
@Arne - is this really a problem for normal cyclists (as opposed to professional racers?) I've used tubes with and without talc and have had my share of hard panic stops, but never had a problem with the steam tearing out of the tube. And I'd be surprised if the talc really makes that much difference when the tube is being pushed against the tube with 100+ psi of air pressure, it seems that if the tire does move, it's going to drag the tube around, talc or no talc. Likewise, nut or no nut, it seems that if the tube does shift, it's going to tear at the valve stem. –  Johnny Aug 18 at 14:20
    
@Johnny I have Presta valves on my MTB, and there I had the problem. On a road bike, you're quite correct; the much higher pressure will keep everything together nicely. –  arne Aug 19 at 6:31

I suspect a big part of the reason people leave them off is because it's something 'real cyclists' do- along with leaving off the dustcap, lining tyre logos up with valves etc. IME there are no real disadvantages to having them on apart from maybe a few seconds in changing tubes, which might get you some tutting on a group ride if people are hanging around waiting for you but that's about it. That said I don't use them on my road bike, and I do line my tyres up with my valves!

share|improve this answer
    
Lining the logos up is useful for finding what ever it was that put the hole in your tyre in the first place. –  alex 2 days ago

The main reason I don't use them is that they rattle when they come loose. If you're heavy handed when pumping though, the nut is useful.

Just remembered one other reason to use them... removing them if you've got a tubeless setup is a recipe for disaster

share|improve this answer
1  
Heavy-handed is almost compulsory when using some of the little frame pumps (of course the solution is to get a better pump, as I learnt). –  Chris H Aug 18 at 13:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.