# How many effective gears do I have on a 21 speed bike?

I have a 21 speed bike (a hybrid commuting bike). But AFAIK, this does not mean that I have 21 different gear ratios. Is there any way to calculate the different gear ratios?

-

Excluding the two extremes (see Scott Robinson's answer), you have 19 ratios. Some of these may be very close to each other. The easiest way (although a little cumbersome) is to count the number of teeth (`n`) on all gears (three in front, seven rear) counting from the centerline of the bike (outwards). The ratio is given as `n(front) / n(rear)`, e.g.:

``````1st = n(front1) / n(rear1)
2nd = n(front1) / n(rear2)
...
8th = n(front2) / n(rear1)
...
21st = n(front3) / n(rear7)
``````

Now you may find identical (or nearly identical) ratios. The number of unique ratios is the number of effective gears.

-

Answers for a typical 21-speed commuter I could find specs on: 20, 19, 15, 12.

20 is the technically right answer, 19 is a slightly more technically right answer, 15 is if you take into account gears that are nearly identical, but 12 is the practical usable answer.

Really, it's going to depend on your exact gear setup.

At the very least, you really should avoid the big-front:big-back gear, since that's hardest on your derailer.

So, if you take @jensgram's answer and work it out on a typical bike similar to what you describe ... I'll take the Trek 7.1FX for my example. The chainrings in front are 48-38-28t. In the back it's 14-16-18-20-22-24-34r. (Numbers are the number of teeth). I don't know if it's typical on other hybrids, but that jump from 24 to 34 is a little unusual and they market it as a special "megarange" feature.

If you work out all the ratios (I wrote a sort of little computer program up real quick to do it), the only exact duplicate ratios this gear setup has is 28:14 and 48:24, one of which is one of those extreme ranges it's suggested to avoid. So this bike actually has 20 unique gear ratios, but since one of those unique ranges is 48:34 that you should avoid, it's 19 usable unique gear ratios.

If you round to only one digit after the decimal to give you the nearly identical ratios, you get 15 gears:

``````0.8 28:34
1.1 28:24 or 38:34
1.2 28:22
1.4 28:20 or 48:34
1.5 28:18 or 38:24
1.7 28:16 or 38:22
1.9 38:20
2.0 28:14 or 48:24
2.1 38:18 or 48:22
2.3 38:16
2.4 48:20
2.6 48:18
2.7 38:14
3.0 48:16
3.4 48:14
``````

But look carefully at what front chainrings you use to get those... If you use the smallest front chainring with only the 3 biggest rear cogs, the middle front chainring with all but the biggest and smallest rear, and the big front chainring with only the four smallest rear cogs, you get your whole range of gears in a way you can comprehend, but it's 12 really usable gears (you skip 1.4, 2.0 and 2.7 in my above chart; all close enough to another gear)

How many rear cogs it makes sense to use on each front chainring will depend on the exact gearing setup. But if you play around with it a little you can probably just feel it. Switch the front chainring to the middle, switch the back to the smallest and feel that gear; then switch the front to the biggest, switch the back in by 2 or 3 gears and see if it feels about the same. Do the same thing with the low-end.

-
If you use unix and can do basic shell stuff, the "program" was a simple shell script: `for front in 48 38 28; do for back in 14 16 18 20 22 24 34 ; do ratio=\$((echo scale=1; echo \$front / \$back) | bc); echo \$ratio \$front:\$back; done; done | sort -n` – freiheit Aug 29 '10 at 19:38

There's no way to calculate the actual gear ratio unless you know the sizes of the cassette and chainrings.

But, you do have 19 effective gear ratios since you shouldn't shift into the two extremes. (Low front/low back, high front/high back)

-

I've heard that the you should only use all the rear chain rings when using the middle chain ring on the front. When using the largest front chain ring, you should only use the bottom 2 or 3 chain rings, and when using the smaller chain ring on the front, you should only use the top 2 or 3 chain rings. This is to prevent having too much of and angle between in the chain. Also, you generally don't need to use those gears anyway, since they are usually the same, or in between the range of the other gears, which means they won't help you much. Here's a good explaination of how to change gears.

So while you may effectively have 21 gears, you shouldn't use them all, as the extremes can cause your chain to strech. Mostly, you'll use only 3+7+3, giving you 13 gears. Some people even say to keep you chain really straight really straight, and you should only use 3+3+3 = 9. Just try to keep your chain as straight as possible. Since there is a lot of overlap, you'll want to shoot for a straight chain as much as possible, over trying to use all the gears.

-

Here is an excellent gear calculator. You just need to know a few basic things like crank length, wheel size, etc. and then it will figure everything out for you.

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator

-

There is just another thing to mention. You can't use all combinations else there is too much strain on the system. With my 3x8 I just ignore the extremes:

• Front 1: Back 1-6
• Front 2: Back 2-7
• Front 3: Back 3-8

You loose some combinations, but they are not very useful anyway.

Note: I once had an accident. While driving, the bike suddenly stopped with a metallic klunc. The rear derailleur was caught between the spokes. Ruining about everything. The bike just had its maintenance (replacement of chain and cassette) so it was probably a mistake of the bicycle repairshop. And they agreed). Athough they said that it was because of the extreme settings (Front 3, Back 1). But that was a result of the accident. So they fixed it for free.

-
Sounds like the cable might have let go. Even on my 10 speed rear, which requires full travel, there's sufficient gap to prevent that from happening. However, if the cable were to break/slip out, it might possible hit the spokes. – Brian Knoblauch Sep 23 '10 at 13:10