Tell me more ×
Bicycles Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people who build and repair bicycles, people who train cycling, or commute on bicycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am just curious, I use Handlebar Mounted lights, and upon having multiple bikes to switch, its really uneasy changing the light from one to another. So, I am thinking of switching to Helmet Mounted lights.

Give me your point of view. Why or Why not? Which is better suitable for which riding type?

share|improve this question
Please do not tell me to write down the my ride type, my bike. Most of the question I ask becomes too localized at the end to me and not so community friendly. – Starx Apr 1 '12 at 10:43
A lot of people have both. But I have a handlebar light and I find it reasonably satisfactory for commuting in rural/suburban areas on reasonably decent roads with light/moderate traffic. In those conditions (and with a fairly strong light with good spread) I do not need to take advantage of the ability to point the light. My main problem, with a 2 hour morning commute, is finding a light both bright enough and long-lasting enough (without spending my pension). – Daniel R Hicks Apr 1 '12 at 12:57

3 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer, as others have said, is "both." However, if you are only going to use one light, there is a disadvantage to that one light being helmet-mounted. When the light is mounted close to the eye, everything that is illuminated is "flattened" since, from the eye's perspective, there are no shadows to provide information about depth. In particular, it's harder to see potholes or other road imperfections. That's why randonneurs often mount a light on the front fork near the hub -- the distance between the light source and the eye helps highlight the road surface. A second issue arises in fog or rain: in that case, with a helmet light you'll get reflections directly back into your eye. That's why you don't use "high" beams when driving your car in foggy conditions, and why fog lights are mounted low.

Given these reasons, a helmet-mounted light can be an excellent supplement but shouldn't be used as one's only light unless you are riding only in urban areas where you can rely on additional street lights to keep the road surface well-illuminated.

share|improve this answer
Excellent points! – Daniel R Hicks Apr 2 '12 at 18:32
+1, Excellent points. Mainly these points was something I have never cared to think – Starx Apr 3 '12 at 3:37
1  
There are other disadvantages of just a helmet light - if your local laws require a light on the bike, a helmet light won't count. There is also the issue discussed at bicycles.stackexchange.com/questions/14821/… which apply to some whether a helmet light is your only, main, or supplementary light, but are likely to be less of a problem if your helmet light is small and light, which makes it less suitable as a main light. – armb Mar 20 at 13:55

In an ideal world, use both. A wide beam light on the handlebar keeps the light on the road in front of you, even when your viewpoint changes, which can save you if an obstacle comes up in front of you in a hurry.

However, if the trail curves sharply, and your light is fixed to the handlebar, then the light can be pointed in the wrong direction, which can have the opposite effect. Adding a helmet mounted light ensures that you have light where you are looking, i.e. down the trail.

This can be expensive, but it is the best choice.

Barring that option, use a bar mounted light with a bright, wide beam. It is more important to keep light on the ground in front of the bike, that off the trail where your viewpoint might be focused, and a helmet mounted light can be more annoying to other riders.

Just my 2 cents.

share|improve this answer

There's no single answer to this other than "do what works for you". While the optimal answer to this question is to have both a helmet light and one mounted on the bike, not all cyclists have the money to do that.

That said, there are a few things that can help you decide, Mac or PC helmet- or handlebar-mounted light:

  • Will you be using more then one bike? In this case, the answer's clearly "yes". If you bring the light with you, you can get one great light setup as opposed to several less-expensive lights. (You can do this with rear blinkies as well as headlights, but a blinky on your helmet is best as one that's supplementing a properly aimed blinky mounted on the bike.)

  • Do you commonly need to direct light in places other than right in front of you? If you ride on a lot of twisty roads or paths, often need to read street signs, need to watch closely for potholes, etc., then a helmet-mounted headlight would be a handy thing. If you usually ride roads you know well in good repair, you may find a helmet light less useful then one mounted on the bike.

  • Is the weight on your head a problem? This is something you can really only decide by trying it out, or by attaching the equivalent weight to your helmet and riding for a bit. Are you prone to neck problems? Does the weight make your helmet chafe? (It does with mine.) This problem will be more noticeable if you often ride offroad or on bumpy roads.

In the end, you'll have to try this both ways and see what works for you. You can give a helmet mount a test-ride by attaching the light to your helmet with a nest of zip ties, duct tape, and velcro. If you like having the light on your head, you can look for a more elegant solution.

share|improve this answer
1  
Yeah, one thing to think about is that the inertia of a large light on the helmet will tend to cause the helmet to slide around as you hit bumps, etc. – Daniel R Hicks Apr 1 '12 at 22:29
@DanielRHicks - This is all too true, I'm gonna add that to the answer. – Neil Fein Apr 2 '12 at 0:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.