Reputation
5,623
Top tag
Next privilege 10,000 Rep.
Access moderator tools
Badges
1 19 31
Newest
 Good Answer
Impact
~188k people reached

Nov
2
revised Can Tacx Flow head unit work with old (2002) Basic frame/brake?
added 413 characters in body
Nov
2
answered Can Tacx Flow head unit work with old (2002) Basic frame/brake?
Nov
2
comment Terminology index - a list of bike part names and cycling concepts
@freiheit: It's an English word that is also a French word. That's like saying "Paris" is an English word that's commonly mistaken for a French word. In English, we pronounce "pannier" as "PAN-yer" and "Paris" as "PAIR-iss" but in French they are pronounced "Pan-YAY" and "Pa-REE."
Oct
31
comment Why choose a traditional frame over an aerodynamically streamlined frame?
Speed increased for the same power output. Power output decreased for the same speed. Power and speed were recorded electronically at one-second intervals. The electronic recording device was not influenced by the rider's beliefs, so claiming that the estimation of Crr and CdA was the result of a placebo effect is incorrect.
Oct
31
comment Why choose a traditional frame over an aerodynamically streamlined frame?
@meagar: Exactly. But the metrics are not speed and power. The metrics are CdA and Crr. We're using a power and speed recorder to record the data in order to calculate CdA and Crr, which are independent of speed and power. In fact, it's the variance in speed and power that make CdA and Crr estimable. We could have done the estimation with a powered electric bicycle, varying the throttle and speed and still estimated CdA and Crr. Even if the rider had a prior belief it's the relationship between power and speed that matters -- and that is what is recorded.
Oct
31
comment Why choose a traditional frame over an aerodynamically streamlined frame?
First, how could "a placebo effect" alter the recorded speed and power? Second, the field test was consistent with wind tunnel measurements. How could a placebo effect affect the wind tunnel? Third, I already pointed out that it was an example comparison of two frames that were already considered aero -- I used this example because the difference was smaller than usual. We really should move this to a discussion room if you wish to continue.
Oct
31
comment Why choose a traditional frame over an aerodynamically streamlined frame?
@DanielRHicks - we can (and probably should) move this to a discussion room if you wish but these advantages don't disappear. Here's an example of a field test under real-world conditions that measured the difference between two frames that were already pretty aero. Subsequently the rider raced in a 40K TT and his actual time came within half a second per km of the predicted time.
Oct
31
comment Why choose a traditional frame over an aerodynamically streamlined frame?
@DanielRHicks - You may have doubts but the differences have been measured in wind tunnels (with rotating front wheel) and also in field tests. Whether the difference is large enough to matter is a legitimate question; but whether the frames "provide measurable improvement" is not.
Oct
29
comment What road bike tire pressure is best for speed?
There is an example of rolling resistance on real roads increasing with increasing pressure about two-thirds of the way through this article.
Oct
17
awarded  Critic
Oct
16
comment Effective breathing for efficient cycling
Unlike weight-lifting or yoga, but like running and swimming, cycling is mostly about aerobic capacity. However, the efforts during cycling tend to be much more variable than running or swimming (especially running on a flat track or swimming in a pool). That means your respiration rate is going to be much more variable than in running or swimming (or weight-lifting or yoga). Sports which are more steady-state allow for more steady-state rhythm in breathing.
Oct
16
comment Velodrome atmospheric conditions
Oh, I was just commenting on your calculation of the power demand. At the speeds you were using in your example, rolling resistance will account for ~50 watts or so. OTOH, if you were just looking at differences in power demand with air density, it's easier to notice that an x% change in air density translates to exactly the same x% difference in aero drag.
Oct
16
comment Velodrome atmospheric conditions
Nice, though you're missing the contribution to total power demanded by rolling resistance, which will be around Crrmassg*v where g ~= 9.8 m/sec^2. It appears the Wolfram air density calculation is assuming some barometric pressure and humidity since you didn't put one in. And, as an aside, I recommend method #4 on that cyclingpowermodels.com page.
Oct
14
awarded  Nice Answer
Oct
7
revised Effective 'equipment minimal' leg strength training for cycling?'
added 322 characters in body
Oct
7
revised Effective 'equipment minimal' leg strength training for cycling?'
deleted 14 characters in body
Oct
7
comment Effective 'equipment minimal' leg strength training for cycling?'
Whoops. You're right. I had intended to write 1.4x their weight at 1RM but somehow it came out as 4x, then I brain-farted and made a calculation based on 4. I'll edit it. Thanks.
Oct
6
revised Effective 'equipment minimal' leg strength training for cycling?'
added 883 characters in body
Oct
3
reviewed Reviewed How do I make the platform side of a Shimano PD-A530 multi-purpose SPD pedal less “slippery”?
Oct
3
reviewed Reviewed Is a leather saddle appropriate for all-weather riding?