Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 23, 2022 at 16:18 history edited Vorac CC BY-SA 4.0
Simple but important mistake, no?
Sep 1, 2021 at 21:08 comment added leftaroundabout @GordonM race cars have stiff suspension so they can maintain a consistent, low ground clearance, which is important for aerodynamics. That does indirectly improve grip due to higher down force – but this is not a thing in bicycles.
Sep 6, 2017 at 14:50 vote accept Omar Kooheji
May 20, 2015 at 9:53 comment added Holloway @Kaz, "rolling resistance will be reduced through the use of thinner tyres" - rolling resistance is actually higher for thinner tyres (all else being equal). It's the higher pressure, (slightly) larger diameter and (slightly) better aerodynamics that reduces the resistance.
Oct 27, 2012 at 20:34 comment added GordonM @kaz As cars built for racing tend to have very stiff suspension with very little travel I think it's safe to assume that they do.
Oct 27, 2012 at 9:19 comment added Rory Alsop @Kaz - fixed the speed bit - I meant acceleration. And the suspension - it may be surprising to you, but yep, suspension reduces your precision dramatically on a bike.
Oct 27, 2012 at 9:18 history edited Rory Alsop CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Oct 27, 2012 at 0:39 comment added Kaz Weight only matters if you're climbing a hill, and you get back that energy when you go down. Oh, and it also matters in that you build up a certain kinetic energy related to your mass and speed (1/2 mv^2). So the more m, the more energy you put in to get moving, and so the more energy you waste when you brake. But you are not putting in much mass-related energy when you're cruising on level pavement. The principal advantage of the road bike is less air drag.
Oct 26, 2012 at 23:44 comment added Kaz Less suspension means more precise braking and steering? Do motorbike and car manufacturers know about this astonishing idea?
Oct 26, 2012 at 12:33 history answered Rory Alsop CC BY-SA 3.0