Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 1, 2023 at 9:33 comment added Peter - Reinstate Monica Around the time at the end of the 1800s when the "safety bikes" came up (which are often mounted by swinging a leg backwards over the saddle while holding on to the handlebar) women were apparently still wearing undergarments which were not closed between the legs. This makes the potential for indecency fairly serious (and the CanCan more spectacular).
S Mar 5, 2020 at 10:29 history suggested Michael come lately CC BY-SA 4.0
Mild grammar improvements.
Mar 5, 2020 at 4:33 review Suggested edits
S Mar 5, 2020 at 10:29
Jul 6, 2019 at 21:29 review Suggested edits
Jul 6, 2019 at 22:00
May 17, 2018 at 20:49 comment added Rider_X @William here is a general article womenscycling.ca/blog/georgena-terry/…
May 17, 2018 at 20:28 comment added William @Rider_X do you have a source for this? Very interesting.
Jun 10, 2016 at 8:39 review Suggested edits
Jun 10, 2016 at 12:15
Oct 2, 2015 at 15:09 comment added Rider_X I have seen no evidence that leg to torso ratios actually differ by gender. It is my understanding that this is a myth and that there is more variation within gender than between gender (i.e., not statistically different)
Jan 4, 2013 at 0:20 comment added D.Salo mikes: Agreed. I just thought "long after women stopped riding in long skirts" was a tad bit overstated.
Jan 3, 2013 at 22:53 vote accept davidsleeps
Jan 3, 2013 at 6:02 comment added Angelo Differing leg/torso ratios are handled by top-tube sizing for any given seat-tube length. I think the OP is asking about step-through frames-- not just sloping top-tubes like on compact geometry frames for road bikes.
Jan 3, 2013 at 1:22 comment added mikes The difference between then and now is now you do it by choice
Jan 3, 2013 at 1:18 comment added D.Salo Some of us still bike in long skirts. Just sayin'. :)
Jan 3, 2013 at 0:42 history edited mikes CC BY-SA 3.0
content
Jan 3, 2013 at 0:35 history answered mikes CC BY-SA 3.0