Timeline for New 26" inner tube different size to old 26" inner tube
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2014 at 2:29 | history | edited | andy256 |
Added tag
|
|
| Oct 25, 2014 at 11:02 | answer | added | Panfred | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 19, 2014 at 7:08 | answer | added | Batman | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 8, 2013 at 7:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBicycles/status/288541330051842049 | ||
| Jan 7, 2013 at 23:05 | history | edited | Colonel Panic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:59 | history | edited | Colonel Panic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:58 | comment | added | Daniel R Hicks | (And understand, as Mike says, that 26 x 1.5 is NOT the same as 26 x 1-1/2.) | |
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:57 | comment | added | Daniel R Hicks | What numbers are on the side of the tire? | |
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:45 | history | edited | Colonel Panic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:30 | comment | added | Daniel R Hicks | It's not clear -- how much have you inflated the tube? With it uninflated (laying limp) is should fit inside the tire without "bunching up" -- it's normal for it to expand a bit when inflated, and the tire prevents that. (The image above looks close to "normal" for a tube that's been a bit over-inflated.) But as Mike suggests there are (at least) two different standards for so-called 26" tires. | |
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:27 | answer | added | Mike Baranczak | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:24 | |||||
| Jan 7, 2013 at 22:01 | history | asked | Colonel Panic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |