Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 9, 2015 at 17:14 vote accept Joe
Mar 6, 2014 at 1:01 comment added Scott Hillson Yes, there are worse things than having only one brake, but not having two is unsafe for the same reason not wearing a helmet is unsafe. You might never hit your head, but then again, you might. Also, I've had a properly maintained brake fail on me once in adverse conditions; maintaining your equipment doesn't guarantee it can't possibly fail.
Mar 6, 2014 at 0:06 comment added Daniel R Hicks I'm not exactly getting why it's unsafe to have only one brake. Brakes should be properly maintained, right? How often does a properly-maintained brake fail (save for forgetting to reinstall the bridle or whatever after installing a wheel)?
Mar 5, 2014 at 22:14 history edited Scott Hillson CC BY-SA 3.0
reworded that bit about manufacturers making single brake bikes
Mar 5, 2014 at 22:02 comment added Scott Hillson Yeah, and I forgot about Sole too. Now I remember almost buying a Sole but I hesitated because I wasn't sure if I could add a rear brake, and I wanted to be able to let my wife use it but not without a rear brake. Maybe I should word it 'manufacturers that make bikes with only one brake are asking for a law suit.'
Mar 5, 2014 at 21:59 comment added Daniel R Hicks "You would be very hard pressed to find a manufacturer that makes a bike with only one brake, that would be a lawsuit waiting to happen in the states." Uh, how about Huffy?
Mar 5, 2014 at 21:32 comment added Scott Hillson @Ӎσᶎ I'm not sure it's accurate to change that to countries, most of these laws are specific to each state or province.
S Mar 5, 2014 at 21:21 history suggested Móż CC BY-SA 3.0
clarified: states->countries
Mar 5, 2014 at 21:05 review Suggested edits
S Mar 5, 2014 at 21:21
Mar 5, 2014 at 19:56 history edited Scott Hillson CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Mar 5, 2014 at 19:13 history answered Scott Hillson CC BY-SA 3.0