Timeline for How do you evaluate and choose chain lubricants?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
24 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 16, 2011 at 20:53 | history | edited | user652 |
added the label used for evaluation
|
|
Mar 3, 2011 at 2:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBicycles/status/43132656816373762 | ||
Feb 18, 2011 at 19:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
Feb 16, 2011 at 19:41 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Feb 12, 2011 at 21:09 | answer | added | Benson | timeline score: 12 | |
Feb 12, 2011 at 19:00 | history | edited | user652 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 27 characters in body
|
Feb 12, 2011 at 18:47 | history | edited | user652 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
now clearer; added 3 characters in body
|
Feb 12, 2011 at 18:43 | comment | added | user652 | @Neil Fein: well enough, I took the bait. Now 50 points rewarded to a person who can answer the question. Have fun! | |
Feb 12, 2011 at 18:42 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
Feb 9, 2011 at 10:46 | history | edited | Goodbye Stack Exchange |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 9, 2011 at 0:25 | history | edited | Goodbye Stack Exchange | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 56 characters in body
|
Feb 8, 2011 at 19:33 | comment | added | Goodbye Stack Exchange | If you don't like mgb's answer, you shouldn't accept it as the accepted one. I think the question is quite answerable. | |
Feb 8, 2011 at 17:58 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Feb 12, 2011 at 18:42 | |||||
Feb 8, 2011 at 17:57 | history | edited | user652 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 480 characters in body; edited tags; added 2 characters in body
|
Feb 8, 2011 at 16:15 | history | edited | Goodbye Stack Exchange | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 567 characters in body; edited tags
|
Feb 8, 2011 at 16:14 | history | rollback | Goodbye Stack Exchange |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
Feb 8, 2011 at 16:13 | comment | added | Goodbye Stack Exchange | wdypdx22 - The question was originally asking about quantifying terms used to discuss bicycle lube. I think your most recent edit went a bit too far, although I certainly agree the question needed to be cleaned up! | |
Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 | comment | added | user652 | wdypdx22: well it changed the topic all together, better just to remove it now. Perhaps, too challenging topic. | |
Feb 7, 2011 at 23:55 | history | edited | user313 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 971 characters in body
|
Feb 7, 2011 at 23:16 | comment | added | user313 | Ok. I edited the title. The question body is difficult. | |
Feb 7, 2011 at 23:07 | history | edited | user313 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
clarify; edited title
|
Feb 7, 2011 at 21:35 | answer | added | mgb | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 7, 2011 at 21:04 | history | edited | user652 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 121 characters in body; edited title; added 6 characters in body; edited tags
|
Feb 7, 2011 at 20:55 | history | asked | user652 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |