Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 15, 2018 at 19:54 history edited Argenti Apparatus CC BY-SA 4.0
added 647 characters in body
Sep 17, 2017 at 1:01 comment added Daniel R Hicks CO2 is not inert. If one should have fancy-dancy magnesium rims there is a non-trivial chance that one could have a near explosion in some sort of accident or collision that ruptured the wheel and threw sparks.
Sep 16, 2017 at 13:33 comment added Argenti Apparatus @NPSF3000 - true, I made an edit.
Sep 16, 2017 at 13:31 history edited Argenti Apparatus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 35 characters in body
Sep 16, 2017 at 2:45 comment added NPSF3000 "CO2 is inert and therefore safe in a fire" Sure, CO2 isn't flammable... but exposing any pressurized container to fire is usually considered a bad idea.
Sep 15, 2017 at 23:04 comment added Kevin Krumwiede @Paparazzi Well, I don't know what to tell you. I challenge you to find a single source that backs up your claim. I think you're confusing CO2's vapor pressure at its triple point (-56.6C) with its vapor pressure at room temperature.
S Sep 15, 2017 at 20:36 history suggested Braiam CC BY-SA 3.0
Why 0? There's no C-zero-O
Sep 15, 2017 at 20:21 review Suggested edits
S Sep 15, 2017 at 20:36
Sep 14, 2017 at 23:38 comment added Perkins @KevinKrumwiede And we use CO2 for these purposes instead of nitrogen because the 800-900 psi room temperature vapor pressure of CO2 is extremely manageable while the 60,000-70,000 psi vapor pressure of LN2 very definitely is not.
Sep 14, 2017 at 22:28 comment added Kevin Krumwiede @Paparazzi "As long as a CO2 cylinder is at a reasonable, constant temperature, as gas is (slowly) used out of the cylinder liquid CO2 'boils' off as gaseous CO2, at the vapor pressure of CO2 at that temperature. This is about 860 psi at normal room temperature, or about 72 degrees Fahrenheit. This process of evaporation continues until all the liquid CO2 is gone." Link Many other sources give similar figures.
Sep 14, 2017 at 22:23 comment added paparazzo @KevinKrumwiede Not buying
Sep 14, 2017 at 20:55 comment added Kevin Krumwiede CO2 turning into a liquid at a relatively low pressure gives it a sort of self-regulating effect. The pressure of the gas on top of the liquid remains steady until the liquid is gone. This doesn't directly explain why they're used for tires, but it explains why they're used in airguns, which is what made them cheap and plentiful for other uses.
Sep 14, 2017 at 20:51 comment added Kevin Krumwiede @Paparazzi The gas pressure in CO2 cartridges is about 60 atmospheres, depending on temperature.
Sep 14, 2017 at 16:06 comment added Mr.Wizard FWIW this says In almost all cases, carbon dioxide which is captured and purified for commercial applications would be vented to the atmosphere at the production point if it was not recovered for transport and beneficial use at other locations. (Regarding point #3 parenthetical.)
Sep 14, 2017 at 14:58 comment added Chris H Similar CO2 cartridges have a long history for carbonating drinks as well, for which other gases don't work (soda syphon cartridges)
Sep 14, 2017 at 14:16 comment added paparazzo @Tooniis The cartridge handles about 5 atmosphere. That is not enough air to inflate a tire.
Sep 14, 2017 at 13:04 comment added mikes There is also the issue of the water vapor in compressed air freezing when the container is depressurized.
Sep 14, 2017 at 12:46 comment added Argenti Apparatus But my guesses are that much higher pressures have to be reached to get oxygen or nitrogen to liquify, and water vapor has to be removed
Sep 14, 2017 at 12:42 comment added Argenti Apparatus Obviously using atmospheric air is unsuitable, as we don't see any 'canned' pressurized air products (think cans of compressed gas for removing dust from keyboards, which are actually filled with refrigerant) perhaps you should ask this question in the Physics Stack Exchange site.
Sep 14, 2017 at 12:28 comment added compton As the current state of climate engineering indicates, not easy to extract from the atmosphere at scale. (That would make it one of the mythical "negative emission technologies", which don't exist but which still form the basis of many climate modelling scenarios on which the Paris Agreement is based.)
Sep 14, 2017 at 12:13 comment added Tooniis 1,2 and 4 are good reasons, but is making CO2 cheaper than powering air compressors to compress air into the cartridges?
Sep 14, 2017 at 11:43 history edited Argenti Apparatus CC BY-SA 3.0
added more ...
Sep 14, 2017 at 11:21 history answered Argenti Apparatus CC BY-SA 3.0