Timeline for Why are most bicycle gears designed to have so much overlap
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2018 at 5:00 | comment | added | Ross Millikan | What is important is not the number of teeth difference but the ratio. Going from 12 to 13 is the same as 24 to 26 or 36 to 39. The 12 to 13 shift is smaller than the rest, but 11 to 13 would be too large in this system. | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 17:20 | comment | added | Grigory Rechistov | Having triple chainring at the front was never an elegant solution, rather it was a successful hack to cover gearing range needed for MTB applications. These days, no high-end groupset comes with a triple at the front; everything is either 2× or 1×. Entry level groupset can still be seen with triple front chainring designs. | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 17:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBicycles/status/1006948442130796546 | ||
| Jun 13, 2018 at 16:51 | answer | added | Daniel R Hicks | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 15:58 | answer | added | Chris H | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 14:13 | vote | accept | user37078 | ||
| Jun 13, 2018 at 13:11 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 12:55 | answer | added | Argenti Apparatus | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 12:38 | answer | added | Emyr | timeline score: 29 | |
| Jun 13, 2018 at 12:06 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 15, 2018 at 7:17 | |||||
| Jun 13, 2018 at 12:06 | history | asked | user37078 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |