Timeline for Rust hole on tube between chain stays
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2019 at 16:13 | comment | added | ojs | In this user's case it's usually the combination of rudeness, incorrectness and revenge downvotes. Note that I didn't downvote because while this is exaggerated, it is not completely wrong. | |
| Feb 25, 2019 at 7:56 | comment | added | cmaster - reinstate monica | Well, sometimes I just don't get why people downvote... | |
| Feb 24, 2019 at 23:52 | comment | added | Andrew Henle | @cmaster Still think it was my wording that got me the downvote? Your answer got one too. ;-) | |
| Feb 24, 2019 at 19:18 | comment | added | cmaster - reinstate monica | I didn't downvote, but I guess that downvote might have to do with the harshness of your words. You see, while I would generally agree that this rusted connection is a really bad thing, I wouldn't immediately jump to the conclusion that the frame is unrecoverable: This connection had its paint damaged quite early, and was likely continuously covered in wet dirt afterwards. That this part has rusted away does not mean that the rest of the frame is in similar condition. The really bad thing is that water might have entered the chain-stays through that hole. That's what needs to be checked. | |
| Feb 24, 2019 at 19:03 | comment | added | Andrew Henle | Downvote with no comment? Seriously? On a steel frame that has one of what's likely one of the thickest chunks of steel completely rusted through? | |
| Feb 24, 2019 at 17:23 | history | answered | Andrew Henle | CC BY-SA 4.0 |