Timeline for I can't track down the source of chain skip - what might it be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2020 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackBicycles/status/1303573880779530240 | ||
| Sep 7, 2020 at 21:49 | comment | added | Daniel R Hicks | Looks to me like your large chainring is pretty badly worn. | |
| Sep 7, 2020 at 20:29 | history | edited | Criggie♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Inline images from comment to answer.
|
| Sep 7, 2020 at 19:32 | comment | added | Weiwen Ng | Now that the question is active again, for 11s systems (the OP indicated he's on the first generation of 11s Dura Ace), users should replace the chain at 0.5% wear. This will enable you to get at least one cassette out of the chain (but the ti cogs on a DA cassette will die quite fast, so run an Ultegra). 0.75% will generally kill even an Ultegra cassette along with the chain, not to mention the chainrings. The figures for 10s systems and earlier are 0.75% and 1%. Running stuff until everything is toast may make sense on Tiagra, but it can't be recommended otherwise. | |
| Sep 7, 2020 at 17:28 | comment | added | Michael | Are you sure it’s actually slipping/skipping or maybe trying to move to a different gear? Make sure your derailleurs are adjusted properly and you are 100% in a gear and not somewhere between gears. | |
| Sep 7, 2020 at 16:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 10, 2020 at 16:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 16:30 | comment | added | Dan M | Yes I replaced the chain, and then the casette after I figured out it wasn't helping the problem. From recorded ride data, I can gather I done around 130 or 140 miles between changing the chain and changing the casette. I assume this is not enough time to warranta full replacement of both again as a result of excessive wear. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:44 | comment | added | Swifty | I read it as replacing the chain then 100-200 miles later changed the cassette, but it doesn't actually say that you replaced the chain, explicitly. It is best to change the chain when you have a cassette, but I think this 100-200 miles is pretty close to the same time. any accelerated wear is minimal | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:38 | answer | added | Swifty | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | aBrav | It's not 100% clear if you replaced the chain before you installed the new cassette. If not, you're just grinding away both the new cassette and the chainrings. At that point of wear, cassette, chain and chainrings should have been replaced all together, otherwise you're accelerating wear on the new parts. | |
| Apr 10, 2020 at 15:02 | history | edited | Dan M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 319 characters in body
|
| Apr 10, 2020 at 13:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 13:52 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2020 at 13:49 | history | asked | Dan M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |