Skip to main content
Bicycles

Return to Question

rehost images on SE's servers
Source Link
edit approved Jul 22, 2021 at 16:51
Community Bot
edit approved Jul 22, 2021 at 16:51
Community Bot
  • 1

Female bike:

Male bike:

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Female bike:

Male bike:

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Female bike:

Male bike:

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Display images
Source Link
edit approved Jul 18, 2021 at 2:05
CJ Dennis
edit approved Jul 18, 2021 at 2:05
CJ Dennis
  • 103
  • 2

Female bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/01-lyx-ral9005-b66-honey-768x512.webp

Male bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_1856-768x520.webp

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Female bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/01-lyx-ral9005-b66-honey-768x512.webp

Male bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_1856-768x520.webp

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Female bike:

Male bike:

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackBicycles/status/1415732921273667584
Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
Sirmon
Sirmon
  • 289
  • 1
  • 3
  • 3

Why are male and female model bicycles different in the between-legs part?

Female bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/01-lyx-ral9005-b66-honey-768x512.webp

Male bike: https://www.pilencykel.se/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_1856-768x520.webp

Other than the basket in front, the only difference is that the female version is far more convenient to get up on and get back down from. And you never accidentally crush your "package" (as a male) when using the female model.

So why does the male version have that bar going straight from the front to under the saddle? I've wondered about this since I was a kid. It almost seems like it should be the other way around: the females don't have a "package" to accidentally and painfully crush.

I don't understand why either model would have the bar so inconveniently placed as in the male version.

There must be some benefit to this design which I don't realize. But what is that?