It seems to me that a lot of full face bicycle helmets do not conform to the requirements of the ASTM F1952 standard for downhill bicycle helmets. Some noteable examples from the best selling list of chainreactioncycles.com are the Bell Super 2R, 661 Comp, and the Urge Drift. All of these appear to be popular downhill helmets that do not conform to ASTM F1952. Why is it so that many full face helmets do not conform to this standard?
asked May 29, 2016 at 9:52
-
Proving, that helmets conforms to standart is non-zero cost. Selling helmets, that does not conform standarts is not forbidden. Using them as long as you do not participate in some contest is not forbidden. Maybe that's answer?– krzyskiCommented May 29, 2016 at 10:00
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
Short answer: they're not required to.
According to http://www.spkids.com/pages/astm-helmet-safety-standards-explained this standard consists of these tests:
- Dropped from two meters on flat anvil (iron block); drops from curbstone and hemispheric anvils placed higher than bicycle helmet testing
- Three anvils mimic various mountain bike terrains for helmet drop landings
- A lower test line than bicycle helmets in the back of the helmet ensures back and side of head coverage
- Chin strap/buckle strength and retention tests similar to the CPSC standard
- Chin bar is tested under ambient conditions
By comparison ASTM F1447 is "Bicycle and roller skating helmets" and the tests are:
- Eight sample helmets, two each in hot (up to 127 degrees), cold (as low as -1 degree), wet and ambient environments
- Four samples (one in each of the conditioning environments) are impacted with anvils of three different shapes (flat, hemispheric and curbstone) mimicking biker terrain
- Dropped from two meters, the peak acceleration of the force during impact is measured
- The ambient helmet is subjected to the positional stability (roll-off) test
- Helmets are subjected to the dynamic strength retention test (chinstrap and buckle strength)
ASTM is American, so assume its degrees F not C.
Summary, the downhill helmet has to pass harder tests than a bike helmet to be accredited to the higher standard.
However, that all costs money, which has to be passed onto the end user as higher cost on that model.
To paraphrase "you can crash harder on this expensive helmet and have a better chance of survival than with a normal helmet" so the thought process goes "I don't/rarely crash but I have to wear a helmet for law/competition rules/downhill park T&C"
If there were cheap helmets for sale that met no standards, but ticked the box for "wearing helmet" then they'd sell quite well.
