I have a pile of old patch kits for inner tubes that are complete except for the little tube of "vulcanizing solution" that comes in patch kits. With time, these tubes crack, or have a cap fail to seal perfectly, and dry out completely. I would love to be able to buy a larger container of solution.

Vulcanizing solution appears and smells like rubber cement but I've seen suggestions that rubber cement simply contain similar solvents and/or polymers. None of my patch kits describe the chemicals in the vulcanizing solution tubes.

What is vuncalizing solution made of?

Can I obtain it in quantitites larger than a tiny tube in a patch kit? Could I make it? Can I at least obtain larger quantities of the little tubes?

  • 1
    Rema sells the stuff by the tube - several ounces for around 10 dollars. The issue is that it has a tendency to dry out, so it doesn't last super long.
    – Batman
    Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 0:19
  • Many bike shops sell both glue and tubes separately, at least in anglonesia. Sometimes for less than the cost of the same bits in a repair kit (but you don't get the instructions or sandpaper/scraper). IME larger tubes are a waste of money, the little tubes I have usually dry out rather than running out.
    – Móż
    Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 2:34
  • I would guess that the adhesive used for EPDM roofing is similar, and you can buy that in 5-gallon buckets. But as others have said, the stuff dries out so fast (once opened), you don't usually want to buy large amounts (unless you are repairing bikes for a living or or exceedingly unlucky with punctures). Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 2:52
  • Just buy a bunch of cheap patch kits from your local bike shop. If you're running out of patch kit materials fast, you need better tires that are more puncture resistant or tuffy liners.
    – Benzo
    Commented Apr 7, 2014 at 13:35
  • 1
    Aside - it works out only slightly more expensive to buy four $3 12.5g tubes than one $8 tube of 50 g. The same total capacity, but three of your tubes remain unopened till you need them.
    – Criggie
    Commented Jul 2, 2023 at 2:26

6 Answers 6


The manufacturer sells said "vulcanizing solution" in quantities of 25g tubes through 1 gallon cans, so you should be able to buy it in larger quantities. Indeed, a quick search of Amazon yield 8 oz cans (or slightly cheaper), and while I couldn't find it on something well known like Amazon there are other places that sell the 1 gallon quantity. However, as many of the reviewers on Amazon point out, an 8 oz can should be a lifetime supply, and won't dry up nearly as quickly as those little tubes.

As far as what it is, that's a little harder to figure out. Checking the MSDS, we find only that it consists of 40-70% trichloroethelyne, an organic solvent. That doesn't really solve the problem, as that's just the solvent used.

To address the question of rubber cement, if we follow your link to Wikipedia, we find that it's generally a non-vulcanizing cement, while the tire patch stuff definitely claims to be vulcanizing.

Moving on, we can think about what the traditional solution to closely held trade secret formulas is. And the tool that was designed to solve that, though only does so imperfectly, is the patent system. Maybe we can find something in a patent filing.

A quick check over on Google Patents yields something promising, Cold self-vulcanizing rubber compositions; however, upon reading the patent, it's a three part mixture, and the process involves things like "the rubber used is a natural rubber, partially depolymerized by mechanical working and peptization with diorthobenzamidophenyl." I don't know about you, but peptization with diorthobenzamidophenyl is not exactly something I feel like trying to cook up with common household substances in my basement.

Reading further on, we find some further promising patents like Tire repair with cured patch or Tire repair by "patch only" method, but they all also involve discussions of the following form:

Suitable vulcanization accelerators include, but are not limited to, thiazoles, sulphenamides, guanidines, thiourea derivatives, amine derivatives, and combinations thereof. Examples of these include, but are not limited to: N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazyl sulfenamide (CBS), dibenzylamine (DBA), N-N'-diphenylguanidine (DPG), Dicyclohexylamine (DCHA), 2-mercaptobenzothiozyl disulfide (MBTS).

As well as references to entire books on rubber and the process of vulcanization: 'Rubber Technology, edited by Maurice Morton, Chapter 2, "The Compounding and Vulcanization of Rubber," 3rd edition, 1987'

None of these appears to have any kind of description of a single readily available material or combination of a few that could be mixed together to work; they all appear to be fairly intricate, specialized compounds consisting of a variety of ingredients.

So I think that the 8oz can on Amazon is probably your best bet. I've heard some people claim you can just use regular rubber cement, but given that there are big cans of the "vulcanizing solution" readily available, my instinct would be to go for that.

  • 1
    very detailed answer. I'm still unclear on what vulcanizing solution actually does
    – deltanine
    Commented Jan 5, 2018 at 10:55
  • 3
    Patents are the exact opposite of a trade secret. Trade secrets are protected only by the fact that you keep them secret, and protected for as long as you can manage to do that. Patents are protected by law, but are fully public and only protected for a limited amount of time. Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 9:21
  • 2
    Right, the reason I brought that up is that the patent system was originally intended to reduce the reliance on trade secrets by providing legal protection for your invention or process for a limited time, as long as you make that invention public. So I wanted to see if that system had worked in this case; if there had been enough incentive via the patent system to make the composition of vulcanizing cement public, and it looks like it had worked, at least for one formulation, though you would need more expertise in the field than I have to put it into practice. Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 14:30
  • I've purchased two cans of 8oz tire/tube cement from the Auto parts store in my whole life. First one around 1976. Dried up in the 1990s. Bought the second around 2010. Still working on the second after years of seldom use and it's still good. Have added nothing to either.
    – Eric
    Commented Oct 20, 2023 at 13:07
  • 1
    "Honey, don't forget the diorthobenzamidophenyl, so we can peptize some partially-depolymerized natural rubber this weekend." Commented Oct 20, 2023 at 16:18

For those that are curious what the difference is between "rubber cement" and "vulcanizing fluid", here's a summary of the chemistry.

The actual process of vulcanization of rubber (Thank you Charles Goodyear) involves the introduction of cross-links between the strands of rubber through a high temperature process. The cross-links are composed of sulfur atoms, and they act to strengthen the rubber.

Vulcanizing solution does not actually vulcanize rubber. What it does is to break the bonds between sulfur atoms in these crosslinks of rubber that has already been vulcanized (for chemists out there, it's a reduction of disulfide bonds). In the presence of oxygen, the bonds between the sulfur atoms slowly reform and restore the crosslinks. If new rubber, such as a patch, is in contact with the old rubber and has exposed sulfur atoms, new cross-links can be formed between the old and new rubber. The result is a true (covalent) chemical bond between the inner tube and the patch. This is called "cold vulcanization", but shouldn't be confused with true vulcanization.

In contrast, rubber cement is simply rubber polymers in a solvent. When you use rubber cement, the surface polymer molecules of the rubber get tangled up with the rubber molecules in the cement as the solvent dries, but there is no new chemical linkage (by which I mean a covalent bond, chemically speaking) between the molecules.

For most applications, both methods generally work fine for patching an inner tube, but the cold vulcanization creates a stronger bond.

  • 2
    I have found generic rubber cement to not work well at all, It has always left my tubes with slow leaks and if stored folded up in the box the patch tends to peal off and become useless.
    – Qwertie
    Commented Jun 18, 2019 at 2:12

The problem with a larger container would be if it didn’t seal properly and evaporated like your small tubes have before, you’d have the same problem. What you need is a stock of smaller tubes you can keep sealed.

Try searching online for a supply of small tubes (I can find 10 small tubes for $4 on eBay where I live). Then open a fresh tube each time you need some, if the previous tube has evaporated.

  • Welcome to the site. I’ve expanded the answer out a little bit and I hope I have maintained your intentions. Please use the edit option to make any corrections or add further detail
    – Swifty
    Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 9:00
  • I know I have ordered single tubes of rubber cement (i.e. not in patch kits) from my local bike shop. I don't have access to their back end, but I'd guess that Quality Bike Parts or some other major distributor carries them.
    – Weiwen Ng
    Commented Sep 11, 2023 at 20:34

According to the safety sheet of the vulcanizing solution type D intended for tyre repair made by Ferdus it is "solution of a rubber compound in liquid hydrocarbons predominantly of a paraffinic character", i.e. C6-C7, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclic, <5% n-hexane) 92%, in which there is: cyclohexane 10%, n-hexane < 5%. An old version of the safety sheet for type D solution also listed <1% of toluene and <0.1% of benzene.

The manufacturer's e-shops shows packagings from 4 ml to 800 ml (no idea whether that is more or less than a gallon).

Another vulcanizing solution type F consists of a similar mixture of rubber in paraphinic hydrocarbons, but different ones: (C6-C7, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclic, < 5 % n-hexane) 84% in which: cyclohexane 10%. The intended usage listed is the same as for the former, but the smallest packaging is 100 ml, it does not come in the small one for bicycle repair sets.

They also have another type T which is intended for refreshing the surfaces of tyres and inner tubes and has similar ingredients as type F, at least when considering the dangerous chemicals listed in the safety sheet.


Is it possible to refresh the evaporated tube with brake parts cleaner? I guess, it is, because only the solvent evaporates the functional ingredients are still there. I figured out that old rubber cement is very good removable from the inner tube with brake parts cleaner, if you want to redo your work. I will test that.

UPDATE: Dried up fluid: mix it with brake cleaner, let it sit a few months, after that it is as good as new. Tested.

  • 3
    Your text is now above under the question among the comments. I can see it there. It liekly did not stand well as an independent answer. Commented Sep 11, 2023 at 20:48
  • @uglypugly The first bit by itself was an idea that was untested, so its been converted to a comment. Now you've tested it, we should combine both lots into one complete answer. You can learn more about how SE is organised in the tour
    – Criggie
    Commented Sep 12, 2023 at 3:07
  • The reason you can't see your old answer is because you've created a second user account. Best to just use the one account - I can't fix this, you can sign into either account, visit the Contact form, select "Account Issue", and then select "I need to merge user profiles". Your User IDs are 70491 and 70488
    – Criggie
    Commented Sep 12, 2023 at 3:09

It's not the cap that causes the unused tubes of patch glue to dry. It's the crimp on the other end. The crimp isn't perfect, and the solvent in the patch glue is highly evaporative.

I suspect the manufacturers of these tubes fill the tube with glue, but not completely, and have the cap end down and crimp end up on the assembly line. Thus, there is a pocket of air near the crimp. Then the tube is crimped shut, but air remains there. If you store the tube in an orientation where the crimp is up and cap is down, the pocket of air remains near the imperfect crimp. Due to temperature changes, the pressure inside the tube changes, and the pressure differential allows the evaporated solvent to escape through the imperfect crimp.

You can reduce the occurrence of this by following several instructions:

  1. Store all tubes crimp end down, cap end up. It's bit harder that way, since the tube doesn't naturally stand crimp end down. This ensures that the evaporated solvent can't escape through the crimp, but rather what should escape is the liquid, and liquid is always more viscous than gas.
  2. Every time you use the glue in a tube, before closing the cap, turn it in such a manner that the cap end is up. Then push all air away from the tube, so that the liquid glue is pouring away near the cap threads. Only then close the cap, so that no air remains inside the tube.

Actually, it might also be beneficial to manually open every glue tube in a patch kit, and to procedure (2) to ensure that no air is inside the glue tube.

Also it is beneficial to use name brand patch kits (Rema Tip Top), and only buy them from stores that have a high turnover rate so that you know you get a newly manufactured tube and not something that could be years old.

  • 1
    Do you have any reference for this or is it just your personal research? Some tubes do not dry out many years, some are unfortunate and will by dry soon after the first usage. Perhaps only some of the tubes have bad crimps, other will have leaks at the opening - since they dry out soon after first use, but remained OK before opening. Commented Jul 1, 2023 at 13:38
  • Here is the reference to this, took a while to find it: groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/6M8BL_nydO4/m/…
    – juhist
    Commented Jul 2, 2023 at 9:55
  • Another observation today: I opened a new glue tube from Rema Tip Top today. Below the cap there was a thin steel foil which I had to puncture using the other side of the cap. It's completely impossible for it to dry out via this steel foil before puncturing it. Yet, the amount of liquid glue in the tube seemed to be very low for the size of the tube. I suspect it had partially dried, via the crimp. 3 years old glue tube.
    – juhist
    Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 19:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.