Since I last used a heart rate monitor (about eight years ago), wrist-watch only monitors seem to have increased in popularity (based on the offerings at Amazon)

update apparently these watches come with a chest strap, although the chest-strap is not included in the product description..

In the 90's and early 00's, heart rate monitors never lasted me more than a year or two before the signal or the contacts started to fail.

My primary question is ... can you recommended an inexpensive (<$50) monitor?

  • 2
    just to clarify you're looking for one that doesn't have a chest strap? – curtismchale Dec 11 '10 at 16:13
  • @Curtismchale - To clarify, I think this question has two parts, one asking for an inexpensive heart-rate monitor, the the other asking about wrist-vs-chest mount units. @David, is this correct? – Goodbye Stack Exchange Dec 11 '10 at 22:57
  • @neilfein, this is correct. – David LeBauer Dec 12 '10 at 22:41
  • @David - Ive updated your question. Also, if you don't get any answers soon, splitting this into two separate questions may help. (I'm not certain why a wrist mount would be less accurate -- it's the same circulatory system, yes? -- but a quick web search shows that a lot of people assume a chest mount would be more accurate.) – Goodbye Stack Exchange Dec 12 '10 at 23:30
  • 7
    @neilfein - Chest strap monitors basically work like an ECG, which reads electrical signals from your heart. Looks like most of the units with no chest-strap measure your pulse via your fingertips, requiring you to stop and touch the watch to get a reading. One's measuring the heart, the other's measuring the circulatory system. And very importantly: chest-strap allows for continuous monitoring. – freiheit Dec 13 '10 at 16:57

I can't speak about HRM's that do not use a chest strap as that's the only type that I have used (other than to play with in the store). I find the ones with a chest strap to be completely hassle free, and I don't have to contort into a weird position to get a reading.

I've had great luck with HRM's from Timex and Nashbar in the $50 range, and like Polar but have never owned one.

If you do go with a chest strap type, the primary thing to watch out for in the lower-end range is the ability to change the strap battery. Some have a sealed chest strap, so you either have to tear it apart and super-glue it back together, or replace the strap entirely.

| improve this answer | |
  • Tip on the chest strap. Dry them after use - they turn on with conductivity, if you leave a layer of sweat they will keep transmitting. – mgb Mar 17 '11 at 6:28

If you look for a cheap chest-strap HRM I can testify in favor of the Sigma PC15, which I used personally.

See a review here.

As for completely wristwatch HRM I never used them directly for the reason freiheit states in his comment and I wouldn't recommend them for cycling use.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.