Why are aero bars usually disallowed in Gran Fondos (cyclosportive events)?

I'm just curious. I would think it would be a useful piece of equipment when riding 100 miles.

  • 1
    riding 100 what? Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 5:54

3 Answers 3


I now realise "gran fondo" is American terminology for "cyclosportive". That sort of event falls loosely between audax and racing. The randonneuring community prize responsible riding, and tend to frown upon behaviour or equipment that could be deemed "antisocial". For example, most audax events require riders to fit mudguards, for the benefit of others.

In "gran fondos", although riders may only be competing against their own personal goals, they may find themselves sharing the same stretch of road with others, and some participants may wish to treat the event as a private race.

Steering control is severely compromised when using aero bars. They're not considered safe when riders may be racing in close proximity - a slight wobble could cause a major takedown. They're not great for cornering either. Hence the reason they're illegal in most events, except triathlon and time trials, where riders are mostly spread apart and riding fairly straight courses.

  • 1
    I've always heard it isn't the instability, it's the inaccessibility of the brakes, leading to colossal pileups. Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 5:08
  • 2
    That's a valid point, but you can fit bar-end levers onto many aero bars too. @EricGunnerson also rightly points out that the aero benefits are negated in a paceline, so I guess it's all moot. Too much risk for no real return. Commented Jul 29, 2014 at 7:59
  • 1
    expanding this comment with a quote. Commented Jul 31, 2014 at 16:36
  • On the other hand having them fitted is quite common in the UK Audax community. Using them is less often seen - as anyone using them tends to be on their own (one possible exception being at the front of a train into a headwind)
    – Chris H
    Commented Apr 8, 2019 at 11:02

@headeronly has the best answer, but this is a great supplementary quote from The Rules: The Way of the Cycling Disciple by The Velominati. It's a tongue-in-cheek book but illuminates the problems nicely.

For a while, aerobars were allowed in one-day races and road-race stages of Grand Tours. But this presented a new problem; when a rider’s grip on the bars is narrowed into an aero position, their hands are far away from the brakes, the steering of the bike is compromised and controlling the machine in a situation where there are up to 200 people riding butt to nose to shoulder, it becomes much more of an issue than if you are barreling into a corner at speed, all alone and can pick whatever line you please. While the type of aerobars were more compact than those typically used in a time trial (i.e., Spinaci bars), there was an increase in sketchiness within the peloton that couldn’t be ignored. Mostly on the grounds of safety, they were banned from mass-start events.


Well, the simple answer is that aerobars aren't very helpful unless you are riding at reasonable speed (say, >18MPH or so), but most people who ride at that speed would prefer to ride in a paceline, which gives more benefit than aerobars.

Aerobars are unsafe in pacelines because riders cannot maneuver as well as being on the drop bars.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.