Has anyone had any success with cameras that can resolve the license plates of vehicles that are near the bike?

What resolution will be needed if we want to be able to read license plate later on?

EDIT: Is resolution 1920x1080 enough for license plate resolution? Or is frame rate (interlaced vs. progressive; 30 fps vs 50fps vs 60fps) necessary; or is it the bitrate that is the most important?

  • 1
    Not with anything I'd want on my helmet. I've used a 1900x1080p60 camera and that was ok for cars that were closer than about 5m, if there was good daylight or the road was smooth. At 1080p30 I needed more light, but that camera dies in the velomobile ice hockey challenge and I haven't replaced it. With a proper video camera - big aperture, mechanical stabilisation - I could get plates out to about 20m in most lighting conditions. But that weighed over 1kg. I'll be watching this question and the footage people upload with considerable interest.
    – Móż
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 1:43
  • 4
    Most of the videos I've seen on YouTube people read out the number plates of cars they're interested in to the camera. Just a thought, although you have to be aware at the time that it's readable the you need it.
    – alex
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 2:03
  • 1
    @Mσᶎ I'm sure the GoPro (even one of the older versions) could read a number plate from further than 5m and they're considerably less that 1kg.
    – Holloway
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 11:17
  • 1
    A major issue will be that most rugged cameras have wide angle lenses - and that's normally what you'd want for a surveillance camera. Looking for a narrower field of view would help as that would mean more pixels per number plate at a given distance -- but a smaller chance of seeing the plate at all.
    – Chris H
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 16:46
  • 1
    @ChrisH - another factor: a narrower field of view also causes more motion blurring (which takes better lenses, more sensitive sensors, and better motion compensation in the camera to overcome). So it's a tradeoff.
    – Johnny
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 19:10

7 Answers 7


Security cameras have a standard called "pixels per foot" (ppf). This means that at a certain distance, an object 1 foot across (about the size of a US license plate) will have a certain number of pixels. As the object moves further away, the number of pixels per foot decreases. As the object moves closer, the number of pixels per foot increases.

This is the correct way to measure whether you can read license plates or not, because it takes the camera lens field-of-view into account. This is particularly important when dealing with the GoPro since it has a maximum field-of-view of 170 degrees! This means its pixels are spread over a much larger area.

Conveniently, security cameras makers also have a standard for reading license plates of 40-45 pixels per foot.

Take a GoPro recording at 1920x1080 (aka 1080p) @ 170 degrees. Presumably you'd use this if mounted to the bike; the wider angle simply records more. Your resolution will drop to 45 ppf at 14.4 feet away. That is, beyond 14.4 feet away, it will get harder and harder to read license plates clearly.

A more thorough listing of a few different cameras: - GoPro 1920x1080 @ 170 degrees; 14.4 ft - GoPro 1920x1080 @ 127 degrees; 19.2 ft - GoPro 1920x1080 @ 90 degrees; 27.2 ft - GoPro 4k 3840x2160 @ 170 degrees; 28.8 ft - GoPro 4k 3840x2160 @ 127 degrees; 38.5 ft - GoPro 4k 3840x2160 @ 90 degrees; 54.3 ft - Novatek NT96650 G1W 1920x1080 @ 120 degrees; 20.4 ft - Mobius ActionCam 1920x1080 @ 116 degrees; 21.1 ft

The last two were selected because they were reviewed by Popular Mechanics as car dash cams, not because of their suitability for use on a bicycle.

More math! (oh noes!) A car travelling at 30 mph (relativistic) is travelling at 44 ft per second. That is, a car approaching you at 44 ft per second across a 30 ft distance (picked at random) will take 0.68 seconds to reach you. At 30 frames per second, that means you can record 20.5 frames. The more frames you get, the more likely that you get a clear one.

However, after laying all that math out, I'm not sure that 40 ppf is the minimum. Digital Image Forensics can recover an amazing amount of detail out of a blurry image, particularly because license plates are high contrast. Judge for yourself by searching for "digital forensics license plate"

I'm also not sure that 30 mph is a reasonable target to aim for; it seems a bit fast in most cases.

I recommend trying it out for yourself. Get a tape measure, borrow a camera, and record your license plate in 5 ft increments, and judge for yourself what seems like a effective distance is. Take angle into account; not everyone is going to be approaching the camera straight on; they could be approaching you from a cross street, so you might be viewing it at 45 degrees or so.


I'm interested in bicycle cameras at the moment, although for reasons other than reading number plates, and I have found several cameras to be available, which look pretty decent. There's a much wider choice in this market than there was a few years ago.

So while I can't say explicitly "such-and-such a camera will read a number plate at 20 paces" I'm happy to share what I've found so far.

The three cameras that I'm thinking seriously about are the GoPro Hero, the Garmin Virb and the Shimano Action camera. So any of these three might be worth a second look. As a start point, there is a cycling blog by a guy called DC Rainmaker, which has reviews and sample footage of all three cameras, which I have found helpful. You might be able to determine from the sample footage whether the resolution is "enough" for your needs.

You imply that you'd be looking for something helmet-mounted. I know that all three of these cameras can be attached to the frame (which is what I'm looking for), so it is probably best to double-check that suitable attachments exist. From what I've found, the area of attachments can become as complicated as the camera itself.

Over and above these, a couple of years ago I did buy a camera for my commute, which I attached to my helmet using cable ties. That was a Dogcam Bullet and whilst it worked after a fashion, there were issues with things like image stabilisation, white balance etc which made the solution less than ideal. This would have been about three years ago and you got the impression that the technology just wasn't quite there yet. If you're interested in this type of solution (it was certainly cheaper than the ones I'm looking at now) I posted my thoughts, and some sample footage, as an answer to this question a while back.

I don't think this is really an answer for you but hopefully it will give you some tips as regards where to start looking.


Here's footage of my commute to work in Manhattan. It was filmed using a Polaroid Cube camera. I stuck it onto my handlebars using the Polaroid-made handlebars mount.

YouTube allows you to view the video in various resolutions using the "gear" dropdown. Even in 1080p reading license plates can be a dodgy proposition. I say it depends majorly on lighting (sun from behind - good, from the front - bad). Obviously at night things are quite different as well.


My old JVC Addixion (XA1) recording at 1080P (30FPS) doesn't get the trick done at any useful distance. There are a number of higher resolution cameras coming out now and I'm thinking about upgrading for just that reason. I'm currently leaning towards the GoPro Hero4 Silver because it'll record 2.7k at 30fps, and it's not as expensive as the couple of 4k cameras that just came onto the market.

If money was no object, I'd probably go for the new Sony FDR-X1000V/W, although they don't say what the battery life is on that guy yet, which could be a deal-breaker.

Update: I picked up a GoPro Hero4 Silver a few weeks ago, and recording at 2.7k (2704x1520) 30fps I can pick out license plate numbers regularly in daylight. At nighttime they're still not very readable because the bright license plate reflecting my head light washes out the dark numbers.

  • Welcome to Bicycles @Kevin. This site is different - it's not a discussion forum; this post does not really answer the question.
    – andy256
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 11:34
  • 1
    Sorry Andy. I thought I was helping to answer the question by giving the poster another data point: 1080P does not seem sufficient in most conditions.
    – KevinC
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 17:19

In my experience, resolution doesn't really matter, as long as you're in the territory of High Defniition.

What has much more effect is the overall brightness of the scene, which directly affects the "sensor speed"

I've got a gopro3 and during a sunny day I could make out the screws holding a licence plate on a car when they're doing 100+ km hour in the other direction. At night I could stop within touching distance behind a stopped car and still not read the plate. Most of this is due to too much light from bike lights, and the rest of the scene being dark leading to oversaturation on the lit areas.

A secondary technique is for you the cyclist to read off the licence plate, so that the audio microphone in the camera can hear you. Its one more thing to think about at a busy moment though.

Don't count on a camera to save you from anything, its merely supporting information for after the fact of an accident. Your best defense is not to get in an accident, so bike defensively and anticipate problems.

Note - gopro makes a bad choice for a proof-camera because there's no date/time stamp on the images.


I have a Contour Roam2 which I use at 720p and it gets registration numbers about 6 times out of 10 which isn't bad at all. The usual reason for them not being clear is vibration on my bike (typically due to a poor road surface) but I'm used to reading the registration numbers out aloud now.

Edit: I often wipe the lens when I'm stopped at lights etc if it's wet outside to keep it as clear as possible.

  • yes that was exactly what I found. You almost want the technology to evolve along the lines of those hand-held tv cameras at sports events, where the camera has been developed such that the image is pretty darned stable despite the fact that some guy is carrying it.
    – PeteH
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 8:25
  • 1
    IME the 4 times out of 10 that you can't read the plate almost always includes the times when the motorist has done something to endanger you. If you've got time to pause, think "hold head still, point camera at plate while the car is still close"... you're probably not in much danger.
    – Móż
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 21:02
  • 1
    @Mσᶎ, absolutely. I agree that if you have the time to hold the camera still et all, then you can't be in that much danger. However, I'm not aware of any camera that is capable of such high levels of image stabilisation that would be required for riding on the roads (certainly those that I have the misfortune of riding on) yet small enough to be used on a bike when riding. Small steps needed. Maybe the police could do a CSI trick and enhance a registration number from the reflection on your handlebars or something ;)
    – jonifen
    Commented Dec 6, 2014 at 23:53
  • @jonc, that was my conclusion. The cameras I've tested have all been "better than nothing" or "way too expensive"... or both. I don't use one because it was more hassle than it was worth, I never seemed to get usable footage of the incidents I cared about. But lots of nice readable plates on parked cars and cars that overtook me at a decent distance.
    – Móż
    Commented Dec 7, 2014 at 0:44

A Mobius Action Cam w/wide angle lens at 720p might do the job. I have no experience with the Mobius but have played around with earlier '808' key fob cameras and discovered a wide angle lens was the way to go to read license plates when used as a dash cam. Techmoan has a very detailed video review of the Mobius.


These key fob cameras are small, cheap and lightweight. I've had good success walking around with one velcroed to the bill of a baseball cap. Haven't tried it on my bike yet.

  • I tried one of those cheap cameras (admittedly not the Mobius), and while it was decent in the daytime, it had terrible low-light performance, late-afternoon rides yielded a mess of blurry, noisy images. I didn't see low-light performance in the review -- have you tried it in less than full daylight?
    – Johnny
    Commented Dec 4, 2014 at 19:58
  • No,I have only played with my two first generation key fob cameras in full daylight. Also, reading license plate numbers has been hit or miss. I can read them best when stopped at a stoplight or stop sign and within about one car length bumper to bumper -- about 20 to 30 feet?
    – Chuck37
    Commented Dec 5, 2014 at 4:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.