How well do mechanical (non-hydraulic) disc brakes generally function when used with brifters?-- This combination seems to be increasingly common among e.g. adventure bikes such as the Salsa Vaya, Genesis Croix de Fer 10 and Specialized AWOL) as well as cyclocross bikes (e.g. the Fuji Cross 1.1 and Merida Cyclo Cross 300) but I was told during a custom-bike consultation at a LBS that current non-hydraulic disc brake technology is not mature enough to work well with brifters: Apparently it has something to do with the difference in mechanical advantage between road bike- and mountain bike-style brake levers. Is this information true?-- if so, is this combination just a marketing gimmick?

2 Answers 2


As other have stated road discs are becoming more common. While hydraulic discs will give you the best performance, it comes at considerable cost. New shifters would be needed. Mechanical disc would reuse your shifters. I would put mechanical disc as a cost effective alternative. If this is an upgrade it is important to use road specific calipers. Mountain calipers and road calipers have a similar appearance but are not interchangeable.


They function fine. Cyclocross bikes with mechanical discs wired to brifters are a common sight in races.

However, mechanical disc brakes are in fact inferior to hydraulic disc systems and I wouldn't recommend buying a new bike with a mechanical disc setup when there are so many good hydraulic options out there.

Mechanical disc calipers only move to squeeze the rotor from one side, leading to uneven pad wear. They also have less power at the lever than a hydraulic system, which it seems like you may be concerned about. In a hydraulic system there is virtually no friction as it is all fluid, and no cable stretch or breakage.

The only reason I would personally have for a mechanical system, and I think it's a valid one, is that the shape of hydraulic brifter hoods is very different from their mechanical counterparts within the same brand family. Usually the hydraulic hoods are taller and more robust, which can be good for people with large hands, or uncomfortable for others.

  • There are situations where Cable is a better choice than hydraulics. High quality cable discs will out perform cheap hydraulics (and probably cost less), and there is no need for new brifters - a massive cost saving.
    – mattnz
    Jan 31, 2016 at 21:47
  • 1
    "Mechanical disc calipers only move to squeeze the rotor from one side" is not true, there are at least three dual-piston calipers out there: TRP Spyre, TRP Hy/Rd and Rever MCX1. Feb 1, 2016 at 10:42
  • @mattnz I agree, but you can say that about any part. Of course high quality is better.
    – ebrohman
    Feb 1, 2016 at 17:54
  • @Klaster_1 thanks for pointing that out. All things being equal, I still feel that they are inferior until someone can figure out the cable friction issue, which had been solved with hydraulics.
    – ebrohman
    Feb 1, 2016 at 17:57
  • I don't know much about discs, but, assuming that the mechanicals can be reliable, they have an inherent advantage over hydraulics in that they can actually be fixed without fancy equipment (e.g. on a mountain somewhere)--- so might there not be more than "only" one reason to choose them? Feb 3, 2016 at 11:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.