enter image description here

I want to know more about KERS for bicycles... I have a question. What will happen if we attach the flywheel on front wheel? Does it make any difference? Please reply me.. I preparing this as my minor project of M.E 6th sem... Please provide some guidence...

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I take it KERS is "Kinetic Energy Recovery System" which takes energy from your momentum and stores it temporarily, also offering a braking effect. With the intention to use this stored energy for subsequent acceleration.

A spinning flywheel on the front wheel may have significant precession effects when spun up. If the rider tries to turn left or right, and the flywheel is co-planar with the rim, then the wheel will experience a rotational force around the long axis of the bike.

In short the front wheel will try and lie on its side.

This would prove dangerous if unexpected by the rider, and the scale of the force would vary with how much rotational energy the flywheel has stored.

A flywheel on the back wheel would experience similar forces on cornering, but the back wheel follows the turn rather than being moved to create the turn.

Downsides to a rear KERS, the wheel is already busy with drive, and often has disk brakes too. Adding something inside the rear wheel will increase the weight where we don't want it, and rear wheel braking is the least useful sort of braking.

So, added weight, added complexity, added adrenaline when the bike kicks sideways, and minimal benefit.

  • 1
    A KERS would also be EXCELLENT on a rubbish truck, because they're consistently starting and stopping at each bin. Or a milk float, if you still have them. – Criggie Jan 24 '17 at 10:08
  • 2
    You should also do a back of the envelope calculation on how much energy you can recover with KERS. If you google search for "E-bike regenerative braking" or something, you'll find people's arguments on how much energy you'd recover. The general upshot is that at best, the system will get you 5-10% of what you put in, but in a decent number of cases may cost you more energy. – Batman Jan 24 '17 at 12:03
  • 1
    @Criggie Milk floats in the UK were traditionally electric, so regenerative braking would be very natural and not involve much extra equipment. – David Richerby Jan 24 '17 at 12:58
  • 1
    I'd think that an electrical KERS system wouldn't suffer from the precession effects. Whether or not that would be practical, I don't know; I suspect the added weight would overwhelm the benefit of the recovered energy for a human-powered bike. Building one would be an interesting project though! KERS for an e-bike might be practical though... – rclocher3 Jan 24 '17 at 18:55
  • 1
    @PankajNegi maybe two opposing flywheels that spin in opposite directions ? Adds to the weight though. – Criggie Jan 24 '17 at 19:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.