2

May sound like a dumb question bit here goes. Is it possible to run a 68/83 hollowtech crankset on a frame designed for 68/73? I can see the crankset fitting without issue as the crank axle is the correct width but the issue would be chain line after fitting. I know FSA produce crank axle spacers for my crankset (gravity MegaExo) but I can't see this helping chain line other then stopping the crankset having lateral movement. My build is a 2009 kona four deluxe with a 1x8 drive train currently setup with sram x4...but I've broken my crankset so if possible I'd like to use the one I have (gravity MegaExo 83mm) rather then fork out more money at the moment. Is there a way I can do this?

5
  • are you referring to the bottom bracket cup spacers that go inbetween the frame and the cups? or are there separate spacers that go on the spindle between crankarms and BB cups? Also, does your bike have a 68 or 73mm shell? – Paul Feb 4 '17 at 18:26
  • It's a 68/73 bb shell. I know fsa make crank arm spindle spacer kits that fit on the crank arm between the crank arm and outside of bb. But it sets the chain line way out – user31395 Feb 4 '17 at 18:30
  • 1
    you will have either a 68mm or 73mm shell.. bottom brackets and cranksets typically group those two together (by saying 68/73) in terms of compatibility because it's easy to design something to fit both. It's probably a good idea to determine exactly which one you have before moving forward. Do you have a link to these spacers? I have never seen them and can't find any info on them, the only ones I've seen before are the bottom bracket spacers. – Paul Feb 4 '17 at 18:35
  • I also just noticed this is your first post, welcome! Check out the tour sometime soon to learn a bit more about how the site works! – Paul Feb 4 '17 at 18:36
  • 1
    This photo shows the measurement that 68, 73, or 83mm is referring to: 2.bp.blogspot.com/-c7JawAnfVGs/VLA2aNyG5vI/AAAAAAAAG5g/… – Paul Feb 4 '17 at 18:39
1

I'm assuming the crank you have is for an 83mm shell, i.e. it has a longer spindle than the common external bearing cranks for 68mm or 73mm (68/73) shells.

It sounds like you know this, but you can't space the cups this much and still have okay thread engagement. You could put some spacers there, usually up to 2.5mm per side, or on some BBs 5mm drive side/2.5 non-drive.

You could use spindle spacers to take up all the slack, and by making the cranks asymmetrical in the frame you could make the chainline correct, or correct-ish. This raises the question of extra leverage on the spindle since it won't be supported where it's designed to be, especially if all the spacers are on one side. That becomes an at your own risk thing. I suspect if it's a pretty burly spindle it would be fine for xc/trail type riding, but that's just a guess.

Since you're 1x you could also employ chainring spacers to help a little with chainline, maybe up to 5mm worth. (I actually don't know what the line is there before there are consequences. They come up to 3.8mm when designated for mid/outer position use. Use steel chainring bolts.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.