Can anyone ID my bike. I was given it about 25 years ago. I think it is a 1993 Cannondale M series frame. I only found one number on the bike 02007902204. It has Shimano XT components with RapidFire shifters and a Manitou 3 front suspension fork. Any help would be great.

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here [![enter image description here][7]][7]

[7]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/hTDMW.jpgenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description hereenter image description here

  • 1
  • So from the vintage Cannondale link it doesn’t look like that the number on my bike corresponds to anything from that site except the location of the number. – Darian Russo Jan 24 at 1:07
  • You might look around for another Cannon serial number site -- it's possible that they had a third scheme in that timeframe. – Daniel R Hicks Jan 24 at 1:37
  • 1
    You already know its a 1993 M series from Cannondale - what more are you wanting to know? knowyourbike.com/cannondale/m/1000/1993 suggests it was a rigid, and therefore the fork is a replacement. And that it had suntour shifters, so the Deore is a replacement. – Criggie Jan 24 at 3:07
  • 1
    @Criggie "I think it is a 1993 Cannondale M series frame" (emphasis mine). – David Richerby Jan 24 at 10:03

This is a Cannondale frame, and i believe its from the model year 1990. The serial number reveals it was made July, 1990. Your bike does contain an aspect of the 1991 models which I'll discuss in a sec.

From 1986 to 1992, Cannondale used two versions of serial numbers, one of which was located on the bottom of the left chainstay as we see in your pics. Your serial number version breaks down like this: First digit=rear dropout width. 0 correlates to a dropout width of 130mm. Is this correct? The next two digits reveal the frame size. 20 inches in your case. The subsequent four digits (here, "0790") are the month and year of manufacture. The final four digits are the production sequence number, which i take to mean this is the 2204th bike of this model* made. *It may refer to a sequence differing in detail than what i assert here (for instance, 2204th 3.0 Aluminum frame, size 20 inches, etc). Reference: Vintage Cannondale.

It appears to me based on perusing the 1990 and 1991 Cannondale catalogs, that you may be riding a 1990 SM2000 Mountain bike from Cannondale. Original paint scheme was metallic blue rear 2/3's fading to silver in the front. The decals were pink. This was the last year for the crimped chainstays, going to oval model year'91.

Your crankset appears to be a flavor of Deore and the '90 M2000 sported Deore XT crankset 48-38-28. Looks like yours may have a 46T or 44T large ring, and several of 1991's models used Deore LX 46-36-24 cranksets. Other anomalies to my proposed model include your bike having an after market suspension fork; most models this year came with center-pull cantilever brakes, where yours are linear pull; the top tube of most 1990 mountain bikes sported 3 cable stops along the top. Yours appears to have only two. Is there evidence of a missing middle cable stop on yours? At any rate, I do not believe any of these differences are fatal to my speculation. Even the lack of a third cable stop can perhaps be explained by production changes related to going into the next model year, 1991, where only two cable stops were on the top tube. Being produced in July 1990, your bike was created at the beginning of the '91 fiscal year and it would be typical to start producing 1991 models the summer of 1990. (I base this on my experience in manufacturing at Winnebago Industries--motor homes and John Deere--farm equipment). You have aspects of a '90 SM2000 (XT components, crimped chainstays) and 1991's model (namely, 2-cable-stop top tube).

Note that I do not believe your frame is the SM800 (the venerable "Beast of the East") based on your top-tube being level and not angled as the SM800. The components are wrong for the SM700 and SM1000, however its possible your frame is these. Measurements would help the case, and these figures can be found in the catalog. "Mountain Frame Geometry" 1991 on page 15 and 1990 on page 31. Here's the link to them via Vintage Cannondale

You have an excellent ride. Enjoy

  • @David Richerby. Agree and appreciate the edits. Looks much cleaner. It seems that my attempts at spacing of paragraphs and such doesn't affect the copy that appears online. I'm either using a windows laptop or Android smartphone to interact online. Is there something different i can do to get a better structured copy out? Or does that fall upon the moderators only? Also some direction on making hyperlinks without the messier URL copy & paste i employ would be welcome. I confess to not taking time to dissect the SE help link for these answers so feel free to direct me to that area. – Jeff Jan 24 at 14:14
  • 1
    Wow. Now that’s the answer I was looking for!! I will verify the measurements and cable stops and let you know. Thank you so much! – Darian Russo Jan 24 at 14:22
  • @Jeff You get a paragraph break by leaving a blank line -- that should work on any platform. You can get a hyperlink by typing [text](url) but, ultimately, I think you're still going to have to copy-paste the URL itself. Full formatting help is indeed in the help centre. – David Richerby Jan 24 at 15:07
  • 1
    Damn Jeff!!! You nailed it. 130mm dropout. The middle cable stop is missing but there are holes for it. 20” frame and I did find the little plastic cable guide on the bottom of the bike that says Cannondale. Added some more detailed pics to the original post. Thanks again!! – Darian Russo Jan 24 at 15:10
  • @DarianRusso One of the features of Stack Exchange is that we encourage question askers to "accept" the answer that was most helpful to them. That gains you and the answerer some reputation points and also helps future users of the site by giving a strong indication that the answer is correct. I'd encourage you to accept this answer by clicking the green tick mark next to it. You can always change your mind, in the unlikely event that it turns out to be wrong, or somebody else posts an even better, even more helpful answer. – David Richerby Jan 24 at 17:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.