The short answer is, yes, having rider(s) immediately behind you provides an aerodynamic advantage. It reduces the power demand at same speed by a few percent, all else being equal.
A question that comes up from time to time when chatting about
aerodynamics stuff is how much impact does another rider in close
proximity have on your aerodynamics, or more correctly stated, does
having another rider in close proximity change the power required for
you to maintain your speed?
We are all familiar with the reduction in power required when riding
behind another rider. This "drafting" benefit is substantial and
anyone with a power meter can see the big reduction in power when they
move from riding directly into the wind to riding behind another
rider. Even if you don't have a power meter the difference is
certainly large enough to notice the reduction in effort required.
But what about when your buddy is drafting behind you or rides beside
you? Does this impact the power needed to maintain the same speed?
The short answer is: yes, both of them do.
But in what way and by how much?
The question as to whether a rider in front gains benefit from having
a rider behind them has been researched before, and the consensus is
that yes, they gain a small benefit. There is good reason for this
slightly counter intuitive result and it's to do with the "bow wave"
of air from the rider behind causing a change in the turbulent air
flow behind the lead rider and reducing, by a small amount, the depth
of the low pressure zone that exists behind the front rider.
This slight reduction in the fore to aft air pressure differential of
the lead rider provides a small but measurable gain. This can be
expressed as a reduction in apparent CdA, but since a rider's CdA
doesn't really change if their position and equipment hasn't, then in
reality it's a change in the forces acting on the rider, and as a
result, the power demand at the same speed is slightly reduced when
compared with having no rider in close proximity (or alternatively, a
rider can travel slightly faster for the same power when they have a
rider immediately behind them).
In 2010 Andy Coggan examined data from a 2007 track session ridden by
his wife, in which she did efforts on the track both with and without
having a rider drafting behind her. In Andy's assessment of the data
"having a rider drafting closely behind them apparently lowered their
CdA by 3.2%, i.e., from 0.198 to 0.192 m^2.".
The reduction in energy demand will be of a very similar amount to the
reduction in apparent CdA. Assuming ~350W, a reduction from a CdA of
0.198 to 0.192 is equivalent to a reduction in power demand at the same speed of ~10W, or 2.8%. In this case the other rider was riding
in pursuit set up, and were themselves very "aero" (an elite track
So that's one example.
This phenomenon has also been reported in the published scientific
literature, examples include:
Racing cyclist power requirements in the 4000-m individual and team
pursuits, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, v31, no.11, pp
1677-1685, 1999. J.P. Broker, C.R. Kyle and E.R. Burke.
where amongst their data they report that the lead rider requires 2-3%
less power while riding on the front of a 4-man team than if riding
solo at the same speed.
Another more recent study examined this using both computational fluid
dynamics (CFD) simulations along with wind tunnel validation as
described in this paper:
CFD simulations of the aerodynamic drag of two drafting cyclists,
Computers & Fluids Volume 71, 30 January 2013, Pages 435–445,. Bert
Blocken, Thijs Defraeyeb, Erwin Koninckxc, Jan Carmelietd, Peter
In this paper they report the lead rider of two riders riding in
single file receives a reduction in energy demand of 2.6% while riding
in the time trial position.
Above are three examples of data from a similar situation, with
reported reductions in energy (power) demand to ride at the same speed
ranging between 2% to 3% for the lead rider compared with riding solo.
There's another paper that reports a 5% advantage for the lead rider
of team time trial, although I'm not able to see more than the
Aerodynamics of a cycling team in a time trial: does the cyclist at
the front benefit?; European Journal of Physics, Volume 30 Number 6,
2009; A Íñiguez-de-la Torre and J Íñiguez
Edit: I've now read the paper and it used two dimensional CFD analysis
on ellipses as a simple model simulation of multiple riders in a line
and is indicative of the principles involved.
I've had the resources to test this for some time but I've hadn't got
around to doing the experiment, mainly because exclusive use of track
time costs money and I'm focussed on working with clients on answering
more important aerodynamics questions for them than doing experiments
just for the fun of it.
But today I had the opportunity to do just such an experiment.
I was doing aerodynamics testing as part of a story being written
about a woman masters rider preparing for the UCI World Masters track
cycling championships being held in Manchester later this year.
Cycling NSW kindly offered and arranged for the track time to make
this possible, and a client of mine, Rod Wagner, loaned a special
power meter to enable the testing on the rider's track bike, while I
offered my time for the aero work.
We'd reached the end of our allotted track time, but as luck would
have it no one else was ready to ride on the track, so we had some
spare time for the experiment, and willing participants.
I won't comment on the primary aero testing session as that's for
another to write about for later publication in magazine and online,
but I'll expand on the impromptu experiment.
The method of measurement
With the Alphamantis Track Aero System, I record and monitor in real
time a rider's aerodynamics as they circulate around the indoor
velodrome. Testing is done indoors as this removes the wind variable
and provides for a well controlled environment. The system enables us
to monitor speed and velocity and along with other key inputs such as
air density, track geometry data, centre of mass height, rider mass
and rolling resistance variables, the Coefficient of drag x Frontal
area (CdA) is also plotted in real time and lap by lap a picture of a
rider's aerodynamics is revealed.
I've briefly explained this system before in this post, which also has
a video demo. You can also read more on the Alphamantis site linked
Normally this testing is done with a rider riding solo on the track
but for this experiment I asked her coach, another world level
master's rider, to join in. His task was to ride in various positions
relative to the test rider (who would continuously circulate around
the track at approximately 40km/h) while her coach would change his
relative position on the track every 4-6 laps as follows and on my
instruction, he would:
- ride in front of the test rider to test the level of drafting assistance, then
- ride next to, and on the outside of the test rider, then
- ride immediately behind the test rider, then
- drop off entirely and stop riding, so that we could obtain data from the test rider circulating solo.
This test process was repeated a second time during the long test run
to validate the results from the first run.
For reference, the test rider is a slim 60kg female approximately
172cm tall, and the coach weighs approximately 80kg and is ~185cm
tall. The test rider was using a track bike with pursuit bars, while
the other rider was using a track bike in regular mass start set up.
The system is really reporting the impact on apparent CdA. It's a
quick way to measure how beneficial or detrimental having the other
rider near you is, and the measurements are not overly sensitive to
the changes in speed during the run (this is the nice thing about the
Here's a table summarising the results of all the data runs. Click on
images to see larger versions.
In the case of the support rider
riding behind the test rider, the test rider gained a benefit of a
reduction in apparent CdA of around 0.008m^2, or about 3.8%. Note (i)
the error range and (ii) the support rider was riding in a more
upright mass start position (and consequently has a larger "bow wave")
and is somewhat larger than the test rider.
Also shown are the results of the traditional drafting, being a
reduction in apparent CdA to nearly half of the solo value, and
interestingly, the apparent CdA increase of ~ 0.013m^2, or nearly 6%
when the other rider was riding alongside the test rider.
Since apparent CdA differences are a little harder to understand, I've
flipped the data around to show, at a normalised velocity of 40km/h,
what the power demand for the solo rider would be for each scenario:
The table below summarises the chart data, and also shows the
difference in power compared with riding solo:
Compared with riding solo, the
test rider gains a ~7W (3%) benefit from having her ride buddy
directly behind her; a 76W (39%) benefit from drafting behind her ride
buddy; and a 10W (5%) penalty when her ride buddy is riding alongside.
So in this experiment, I found a 3% energy demand benefit from having
a trailing rider, and that's right in line with (but at the top of)
the range found by the other reported data referenced earlier.
This result of a 10W penalty when riding alongside another rider is
more novel, although it doesn't surprise me it may be news to some.
It is something to ponder when riding in team formation events,
especially when the lead rider pulls aside to make their way to the
back of the line of riders. They and their team are better off (at
least in low yaw conditions) if the rider pulls over and moves well
away from their companions until they are near the back and can return
to be in the draft of the other riders. 10W is nothing to sneeze at.
So it would seem that if you wish to ride alongside your ride buddy,
it might cost you ~10W give or take. If speed is of the essence, then
ride in single file, you'll both go quicker that way.