I'm hoping for either a scientific paper that has looked into this, or at least some plausible statistics from enthusiasts.

This is definitely related to my other question Can I use WD40 and generic bicycle oil to maintain my MTB drivetrain?

However, even if that worked fine for me before, I have a slightly nicer and faster bicycle now, and I'm curious if there is anything at all to be gained from improving this.

If comparing the cheapest and "worst" lubricant versus the "best" lubricant for the drivetrain on a bicycle, what if any performance benefits can be expected? What about other benefits, or disadvantages, such as maintenance intervals, accumulation of debris and particles on the chain?

Basically, is this worth looking into at all?

  • I think by "oil", you mean chain lubricant. I don't believe chain oil is standard terminology among cyclists, although I agree many chain lubes are oil-based. I don't think they all are oil-based, though.
    – Weiwen Ng
    Commented Oct 28, 2019 at 17:43
  • @WeiwenNg Good point, I edited my question. Commented Oct 28, 2019 at 17:44
  • 1
    Depends on how deep your wallet is. Personally I use whatever was on special.
    – Criggie
    Commented Oct 28, 2019 at 19:09
  • 1
    is this worth looking into at all? IMO, not at all. Bicycle lubricants are almost all nothing more than repurposed automotive or industrial or even marine lubricants. The operating conditions for those are a lot more demanding than anything a bicycle can subject them to. Companies like Finish Line buy those lubricants in bulk, put them in small plastic bottles with the word "bicycle" somewhere on it, and charge you $5/oz for something they bought in bulk for $60/huge drum. Find a cheap automotive/industrial lubricant that fits your conditions - water repellent, doesn't collect dirt, etc Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 9:51
  • @WeiwenNg In certain languages the word for oil is indeed used for bike lubricants even though a word for a generic lubricant does exist as well. Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 14:58

2 Answers 2


There are actually some organizations that have tested various chain lubricants against each other. However, some caveats. The easiest thing to test in the laboratory is drivetrain friction. The chain's durability to contamination is harder to test, although one person has done this.

The research is described in this Cyclingtips article. One caveat is that it's aimed mainly at performance-oriented cyclists. Friction Facts did the drivetrain friction test, and found that the worst tested lubricant (White Lightning Epic Ride) cost you about 3 watts of drivetrain friction versus a good lubricant, e.g. NFS, Rock-n-Roll Absolute Dry, two Finish Line products, or even Mobil1 5W-20 motor oil.

3 watts is not a lot of power, though. It is unlikely to cost you a significant placing in an amateur race. I suspect that the minimum difference an average cyclist can perceive is bigger than 3W (albeit I know of no studies of this question).

You also might want to consider durability. For example, some lubricants attract less dirt than others. White Lightning claims that some of its lubricants are self-cleaning, and I got suckered by this when I was a newer rider, but it's very likely untrue in White Lightning's case. Dirt on a chain works like a grinding paste, which is why it's better to keep your chain clean (which, admittedly, a lot of cyclists don't do). Zero Friction Cycling's test reported the estimated running costs of each lube under the test protocol, which involved contaminating the chain gradually and replacing it once it hit a specified amount of wear.

Your question as asked in the title can't be answered exactly. It's more complicated than that. Also, I don't know that the inexpensive oil you report using on your other question was tested for wear; the friction test does report Mobil motor oil, but I'm not sure how your oil compares to this. I guess we can definitely say that people should not use White Lightning Epic, unless White Lightning is giving you chains and cassettes for free. Most people should probably also stay away from Muc Off Nanotube or Hydrodynamic lubricants, since they seem to wear fast and are very expensive. That said, it's probably safe to assume that they're very low friction lubricants (they don't appear to have been specifically tested for friction); if you compete in the Tour de France, then I believe your equipment sponsor will take care of the chains, so you could and maybe you even should use those lubricants. (Alternatively, if you are a competitive road racer, you could also just leave this question to the directeur sportif and the mechanics.)

The article did report that one of the testers recommended not using oil-based lubricants. They generally seem to have higher friction, and their viscosity attracts grit, which damages the chain (but note that the same person said this might not apply in harsh off-road conditions). So, you may be better served by going to a dry lubricant. They recommended one particular lube, which I also use. But other good ones are probably more widely available. We don't discuss product recommendations here, and discussing specific products (aside from the ones above!) isn't necessary to answer the question, so I must recommend you read the article and do your own research. If you have two bikes, you could try out a dry lube on one and see if you can keep the chain cleaner with it.

Aside from that, I have to wonder if most lubricants (aside from White Lightning Epic) would perform adequately if you kept the chain clean. The method you described in your other question doesn't really clean inside the rollers very much. On-bike chain cleaning devices aren't very expensive, and they will brush inside the chain. This should help you get the chain cleaner.


The main point is to use wet lube in wet conditions and dry lube in dry conditions. The vendor is secondary although a ceramic lube or even a wax might be beneficial in dry road conditions (where you don't have to clean the chain after each ride like on an MTB).

  • Thank you Vladimir, do you have a source for this statement? Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 16:33
  • Which one in particular? That the vendor is secondary? Or the importance of wet/dry? There are many articles and videos about lubricants. A bad choice of the lube type (wet/dry) can definitely do more harm than what can a difference between different brands be. Commented Oct 29, 2019 at 16:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.