I am 5 feet tall, age 63, weight about 110 pounds, and I ride mainly for exercise on paved greenway trails. I used to ride a lot and can go many road miles, say up to 20 miles, quite well on terrain that is mostly flat but I struggle on hills. My old Marin 21-speed from REI feels too heavy and I want a bike that is lighter weight, a little easier overall to ride, and may "help" me get up hills (a la Atlanta, Georgia, if you know what I mean...) without having to walk my bike. However, the Marin has 21 speeds and I like being able to choose gears. But I am thinking of the 7-speed Cannondale Treadway 3 which I tried yesterday and it rides like a cloud! Apparently the 7 speeds only allow you to pedal to a limit on flatter or downhill terrain, and then it sort of spins out and you have to coast. At least that is how I interpret what the bike shop guy said. I'd rather be assured I will get some pedaling exercise while flatter sections. Is this a good tradeoff? I don't want or need a souped-up bike and at $635 the Treadway seems like a nice buy.

  • 1
    A direct product comparison between two specific models is a little too specialised. Perhaps your underlying more-generic question is "why would I change from a 21 speed bike to a 7 speed bike?" which would probably be more suitable.
    – Criggie
    Apr 27 '20 at 13:21
  • First, you're going to coast on any decent downhill anyway - look at pro racers. They don't pedal downhill because they'd spin out too. It's faster to stop pedaling and get as aerodynamic as possible on any descent that's long and steep enough. So don't worry about that. Why are you walking up hills now? You should be on the easiest gear when climbing. You need to provide more details of what gears you are using when, because if you have to walk up some hills, you are not likely at all to be spinning out in flat areas - that'd probably be 25 mph or so on a mountain bike. Apr 27 '20 at 17:00
  • 1
    Orthogonal observation, inexpensive mechanical disc brakes often require frequent alignment and adjustment. For a 'ride around town' bike where you've been happy with good old reliable V-brakes and maybe you or the shop replaces the pads once a year or whatever, that line item may be dubious as an 'upgrade.'
    – Affe
    Apr 27 '20 at 19:21

Do you use the front derailleur? It seems many people in reasonably flat areas do not. If not, you are riding a 7 speed. Take a ride and notice what gears you are using, particularly on the steepest climb and the steepest descent. The lowest gear will be with the smallest chainring in the front and the largest cog in the back. The highest gear will be with the largest chainring in the front and the smallest cog in the rear. Your gear ratios come from dividing the number of teeth on the chainring by the number on the cog. Now you can compare the ratios available on the new bike to what you are using on the old one. If you are having trouble up hill, do not accept a bike with any higher a low gear. If you want to pedal down hill, do not accept a bike with any lower a high gear than you use now.

If you are using all the gears you have, a new seven speed will either have a much narrower range of gears or much wider spacing between the gears. The spacing won't be a factor 3 wider because the gears overlap. If the new one has the same range, try shifting two gears at a time on the old bike. Is that too large an increment? If so, you need more than seven gears.

  • Thanks for your details. I never have used the 3rd (large cog?) gear on my 21-speed Marin. Usually keep it at 2nd gear and switch around a big on the smaller cogs (?) while keeping it in 2nd; on hills I go to lowest gear and lowest everything and still find it hard, mainly because -- hey, I confess -- I'm out of shape. So, I need to c compare the gear ranges on my old vs. new bike?
    – Ellen
    Apr 28 '20 at 15:26
  • Yes, and if you get into shape you may want a few higher gears. As you get into shape you may tend to pedal a faster cadence, which will increase speed in the gears you have. That is a good idea for endurance and knee health anyway. I would definitely not sacrifice any low gears that you use Apr 28 '20 at 15:49
  • THANKS. So I researched the "cassette" numbers. On my current old 21-speed Marin Kentfield hybrid bike, it says 14-28; the 7-speed Cannondale Treadway I am considering says it is 11-32. So, doesn't that appear to be an improvement in terms of the Cannonade having a lower low gear and a higher high gear? Appreciate your knowledge.
    – Ellen
    Apr 28 '20 at 15:55
  • That will compensate for the range you lose by not having two chain rings that you use. Whether it is full compensation depends on the chain rings on the two bikes. Seven gears over 11-32 leaves the spacing rather wide so you will be off your best pedaling speed, but it will probably give you the range you want. Apr 28 '20 at 15:58
  • I find the Treadway has a 38 tooth chainring, while the current Marin is 48/38/28. I don't know if the Marin has changed from when you bought it. Your low gear will go up from 28/28 (if you use the small chainring) to 38/32. That is probably removing your lowest gear. The high end without your Marin's large chainring will be higher. Apr 28 '20 at 16:03

A 7 speed bike will have a very limited range of gear ratios compared to a 3x7 (triple front rings, seven sprockets in back, AKA 21 speed) bike. What your bike shop guy was saying is that the Treadway has the same low gears as the Marin, but sacrifices higher gears used for flat sections or downhills.

If you live in an area that you regard as hilly I think it's very likely that you will find a 7 speed bike restricting. There are reasonable quality 3x7 or 3x8 bikes available. The extra front gears need not add a huge amount of weight.

  • THANKS! Got any recommendations for a reasonable quality, affordable 21-speed fitness / road bike for a short lady?
    – Ellen
    Apr 28 '20 at 15:27
  • @Ellen specific product recomendations are off topic here, but I'd go with a mainstream brand (Trek, Specialized, Giant, Cannondale) from a real bike store. If you are short you really just have to test ride a bunch of bikes. Avoid suspension forks, at the cheaper end of the price range they just add weight to the bike. Apr 28 '20 at 16:24

I used to ride, commute and do delivery on the city of Lima, Perú.

The city is mostly flat, with only a few sloped streets. I initially assembled the bike in a 8x1 configuration. The chainring was a 42 or something. The cassette was a something-28.

I could keep up with other fast riders on flat streets even if I had to spin a lot more. However, I had not low enough gearing to climb out of the basement parking. (climb 2 meters over a distance of about 20), so when I started in the delivery job, I changed the crankset to a triple (22-32-42) and it was absolutely the right thing.

I had been an MTB rider all of my riding life, so going back to something x3 was for returning to natural habitat. Not only for riding up slopes, but for city riding in frequent start-stop, specially with a loaded rack.

In this case, being the same bike, I can say I made an "all other things equal" comparison.

I have ridden 6x3, 7x3, 8x3 and 9x3 bikes, as well as singlespeed. I'd say the change from one to the other is not such a big difference as going from x1 to x3. That is, adding one sprocket is just that, one more sprocket. But adding a chainring is like adding 2 or 3 sprockets (in terms of range widening) even with all the overlapping ratios.

On the other hand, a bike that feels "heavy to pedal" may be a symptom of lacking maintenance, cheap transmission components or even bad bike fit. I have rode heavy bikes that are like butter to pedal, and also cheap bikes where no amount of maintenance would make them comfortable to ride. (Cheap bikes and BSOs are not worth upgrading parts)

In your case, in order to choose I'd say you must evaluate your habitual riding. If you ride on flat ground or with little slopes, or if you do not care about achieving high speed on flat, go for the 7 speed.

But if you want to overcome steep climbs and also have good speed on the flats, then you may need a bike with more gear ratios.

In my case, climbing out of the garage was only a nuisance, just part of getting the bike out. But using the bike for work and be able to climb steep hills, I really needed more gears. When I added then I was able to join some club rides that did went into the hills outside Lima, and they are indeed quite steep.

Nowadays I live in my home town, Tegucigalpa, a city so hilly that I would never use a 7x1. I commute on a 8x3 and can comfortably climb the steepest hills yet I do not run out of gears on flat. (A modern 10x1 or 11x1 has the range though, I ride with people that uses them, however those bikes are quite expensive)


If you want something that will make it "easier" to get up hills, you need to consider the gear ratios on your current bike and the Treadwell.

The following picture is from the Cannondale's website for the Treadwell. I have highlighted the gears which the Treadwell uses. The big ring up front (aka chainring) has 38 teeth, while the rings in the back (aka cogs) range in size from 11 teeth to 34 teeth. If you were going up a hill on the Treadwell, you would want to use the largest cog on the back (which is 34).

enter image description here

Now we can work out the gear ratios for the Treadwell. If we divide the number of teeth on the front ring by the number on the rear ring, we get the number of times the rear wheel will turn every time you do a complete rotation of the pedals. Using the 34 cog in the back...

teeth on front ring / teeth on rear cog = number of wheel rotations per pedal rotation

38 / 34 = 1.12

So we find that the "lowest" gear on the Treadwell is 1.12, meaning the rear wheel turns 1.12 times for every rotation of the pedals. Now you just need to do the same calculation for your Marin. Divide the number of teeth on smallest front ring by the number of teeth on largest rear ring.

The lower the ratio, the "easier" it is to get up hills.

Always remember: regardless of whether you are trying to find the highest gear ratio or the lowest, the front ring gets divided by the rear ring. The formula is always front/rear.


Hills = small gear front, big gear back. Flat = big/med front, small/med back.

A racer/road will not have with 3 speed and will feel heavier, because it will not have the needed gears for hills. Your 21 gear hybrid is better for hills.

But I suspect you are not using the gears properly, and this is why it feel heavy.

The nice guy in the shop is trying to make a sale. :D

If he wants a sale ask him for a lighter version of your bike or an electric assisted one.

Good luck.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.