In the races I've watched, occasionally a rider who has suffered a mechanical will be given a neutral service bike to continue racing on. I always wonder if this does any good because the rider never seems to make it back onto the peleton or breakaway group.

This article from bicycling.com says:

Generally, the rider will stay on the neutral service bike for only a few miles before pulling over in a better spot and exchanging it for a team-supplied spare with the correct fit coordinates.

I've never noticed this happening, but that may be because I mostly watch women's racing, and maybe they don't have as many team spare bikes at the ready as the men? Nor have I ever noticed anyone crossing the finish line on a neutral service bike (although I'm sure that does happen).

My question can be answered with the following: has a rider on a neutral service bike ever gotten a top-10 result or been able to sufficiently perform domestique duties, directly assisting a team member in getting a top-10 result?

In my research, I found two interesting incidents in which the service bikes were unhelpful:

  1. Fabio Aru "couldn't really pedal" because of a high seat
  2. Chris Froome's neutral service bike had Look pedals instead of Shimano

Note: since I'm new to cyling, I've probably made some incorrect assumptions here. Please feel free to correct any of them

  • 2
    I sometimes wonder what the race results would be like if everyone was on a neutral service bike for a stage.
    – Criggie
    Aug 26, 2020 at 1:25
  • 2
    Starting in 2017 some service bikes had dropper posts to help with just what Aru said. I wonder why that stopped.
    – Andrew
    Aug 26, 2020 at 1:56
  • 1
    Even a quick release seat post clamp would be effective in those scenarios. That's what used on MTB before dropper posts as well! Aug 26, 2020 at 6:42
  • 1
    Chris Horner discusses the topic in this video, following a neutral service bike change in yesterday's Flèche Wallonne. youtube.com/watch?v=mlmOsOMYiBE Apr 22, 2021 at 5:27
  • @Superman.Lopez I love Horner's corner! Thanks for the tip, I will definitely check it out. Apr 22, 2021 at 16:13

2 Answers 2


The problem is the lost time due the break down. The question is 'can a ride catch up after a break down', the neutral support bikes gives him a chance, no matter how small.

After a breakdown, the rider has two choices - wait for a team support vehicle with a bike fitted for him, or take a neutral support bike and get moving (likely at a slower pace) while the support teams sort out a bike and arrange a suitable place to swap. (I suppose he has a third choice - withdraw from the race)

From a pure racing perspective, the answer is as simple as filling in the variables - Lost time waiting vs lost time on the slower bike and a second bike swap. In some cases the second swap may cost more than the slower bike, in which case finishing on the neutral support bike would be pragmatic. All this is easy to say on paper - in the heat of the moment this is all a judgement call.

However, the neutral support bike has a significant safety advantage where the breakdown has occurred in a location that the support team cannot get well clear of the other riders. The rider and neutral support team can be cleared from the dangerous situation in the shortest time possible, and a safe location for the riders support team to setup the bike and hand it to him can be chosen. The pressure to get the rider moving comes off the riders support team, who may compromise safety in the heat of having a rider standing around waiting for them. The team also have more time to set the bike up exactly right for the rider, so less chance of an incorrect configuration.


As to your question about women cycling: for professional races (for example World Tour) I believe the teams have comparable number of spare bikes compared to men teams.

I think Mattnz answer offers reasonable explanations. I also think of two other practical reasons:

  • When a team has a rider ahead of the peloton, the race director will allow the director sportive car to pass the peloton to support their rider (with bottles/food/spares). This means the easiest spare bike for that/those rider(s) will be their team spare bike. Not coincidentally, you will more likely see a bike swap happen with the team spare bike as the front of the race is the more likely subject of the TV cameras (rather than the back of the bunch).

  • When you have an issue with your bike while being in the peloton there are two advantages in waiting for your team's spare: your mechanic will pass you a bike that is a reasonable size (if not exact your bike), with the correct pedals, etc and likely correct orientation of front and rear brake, and, importantly, you will likely be able to draft your team's car back to the peloton. This is not allowed and so the neutral support wouldn't take part in this. It is however the current status quo in racing and is rarely penalised (notable exception is the 2019 Junior World Championship where the winner, Nils Eekhoff, was disqualified for drafting after having an accident).

I don't have an exact answer to your question about finishing in top 10. I can't remember ever seeing it happen, and I think that is due to the reasons listed.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.