What is the mechanical advantage of mechanical rim brakes and levers?

I understand that the amount of hand force required for a given braking force depends on the mechanical advantage of the braking system, which in turn is a multiplication of the mechanical advantage of the levers and the mechanical advantage of the brakes.

However, I have not seen any definitive resource on the mechanical advantage of the brake components. How can the mechanical advantages be determined?

Let's limit this question to rim brakes. Disc brakes can have their own question.

Levers:

Here calculating the mechanical advantage is easy. It is the distance from pivot to fingers divided by the distance from pivot to cable anchor.

Examples for levers:

• Dia Compe 287V V-brake drop bar levers: 75mm / 29mm = 2.6x (approximately)
• Tektro RL520 V-brake drop bar levers: 72mm / 33mm = 2.2x (approximately)
• Shimano BL-R400 drop bar levers: 72mm / 14mm = 5.1x (approximately)
• Some cheap Shimano V brake flat bar levers: 60mm / 38mm = 1.6x (approximately)

Note that the mechanical advantage of drop bar levers depends on where your fingers lie on the lever. The mechanical advantages here were for braking on the drops. On the hoods the fingers cannot reach as far down on the lever, so with my hands, the numerator of the division is only 63mm. Then the mechanical advantage of Dia Compe levers drops to 2.2x, Tektro RL520 levers drops to 1.9x and of BL-R400 drops to 4.5x, but of course it needs to be remembered that the fingers are in an inoptimal angle on the hoods, so the brakes feel even worse than what you could assume solely based on the theoretical mechanical advantage. On flat bar levers there is only one braking position.

Brakes:

For single pivot sidepulls, the mechanical advantage can be calculated by dividing the horizontal pivot-to-anchor distance by vertical pivot-to-shoe distance. I do not have any single pivot sidepulls here, but if I search for pictures of old Campagnolo Record single pivot sidepulls, their mechanical advantage seems to be around 1.0x.

Sorry I don't have any dual pivot sidepulls here and I cannot analyze their complicated mechanism without seeing the brake in real life as opposed to seeing it only in pictures on the Internet. Thus, I cannot analyze the mechanical advantage of dual pivot sidepulls. Presumably it is higher, but how much higher I cannot say. Feel free to edit this answer or to provide another answer for dual pivot sidepulls.

I saw detailed enough pictures of dual pivot sidepulls here: https://www.parktool.com/blog/repair-help/dual-pivot-brake-service -- from picture in "6 CENTERING" I estimated (using pixel-level measuring tool of Gimp) that the less forceful arm has a mechanical advantage of 269.3/278 = 0.969x and the more forceful arm has a mechanical advantage of 444/206 = 2.155x. Because there is a forced centering mechanism, the average mechanical advantage is about 1.6x and it applies to both arms of the brake due to the forced centering mechanism.

There is an existing resource of cantilever geometry by Sheldon Brown but I believe it has a fatal error in the mechanical advantage formulas: it uses the direct pivot-to-shoe distance as opposed to the vertical pivot-to-shoe distance. Thus, it gives too low mechanical advantages as the direct pivot-to-shoe distance is always longer than the vertical pivot-to-shoe distance.

V brake mechanical advantage calculation is easy: divide the vertical pivot-to-anchor distance by the vertical pivot-to-shoe distance.

Example on Surly Long Haul Trucker 28" frame having 31mm vertical pivot-to-shoe distance:

• Some cheap "MTB" Shimano V-brakes: 103mm/31mm = 3.3x
• Shimano BR-R353 "road" V-brakes: 86mm/31mm = 2.8x

The mechanical advantage of V brakes cannot be adjusted as opposed to that of cantilever brakes. The mechanical advantage of V brakes can vary from frame to frame and from fork to fork, as the location of pivots does not have a standard with millimeter level accuracy.

The final mechanical advantage (multiplication of lever mechanical advantage and brake mechanical advantage) should be between 4.0x (if you like lots of hand force) and 9.0x (if you like little hand force). Ratios above 9.0x run out of lever travel quickly and thus require adjusting the barrel adjuster very often, have excessively small pad clearance, so the brakes rub if the rim is even slightly out of true or if the rim or frame/fork flexes, and the brakes still have lots of free motion in the lever despite the small pad clearance. Ratios below 4.0x require very strong fingers to brake.

We can determine the following combinations to be compatible:

• Old Campagnolo Record sidepulls + BL-R400: 5.1x
• Dual pivot sidepulls + BL-R400: 8.1x
• Surly LHT + BR-R550 cantilevers + BL-R400: 7.7x
• Cheap "MTB" Shimano V brakes + cheap Shimano flat bar V brake levers: 5.3x
• BR-R353 "road" V-brakes + cheap Shimano flat bar V brake levers: 4.5x
• Cheap "MTB" Shimano V brakes + Dia Compe 287V drop bar V brake levers: 8.6x
• BR-R353 "road" V-brakes + Dia Compe 287V drop bar V brake levers: 7.3x
• Cheap "MTB" Shimano V brakes + Tektro RL520 drop bar V brake levers: 7.2x
• BR-R353 "road" V-brakes + Tektro RL520 drop bar V brake levers: 6.1x

Based on this, it can be concluded that Tektro RL520 is probably best paired with "MTB" V brakes and Dia Compe 287V is probably best paired with "road" V brakes. With "MTB" V brakes, one obtains more tire clearance, so that's certainly an advantage.

We can also determine the following combinations to be incompatible:

• Cheap "MTB" Shimano V brakes + BL-R400: 16.8x (too high!)
• BR-R353 "road" V-brakes + BL-R400: 14.3x (too high!)
• Old Campagnolo Record sidepulls + Dia Compe 287V drop bar V brake levers: 2.6x (too low!)
• Old Campagnolo Record sidepulls + Tektro RL520 drop bar V brake levers: 2.2x (too low!)
• Old Campagnolo Record sidepulls + cheap Shimano flat bar V brake levers: 1.6x (too low!)
• Surly LHT + BR-R550 cantilevers + Dia Compe 287V drop bar V brake levers: 3.9x (too low, may be near the threshold of acceptability on the drops but not on the hoods!)
• Surly LHT + BR-R550 cantilevers + Tektro RL520 drop bar V brake levers: 3.3x (too low!)
• Surly LHT + BR-R550 cantilevers + cheap Shimano flat bar V brake levers: 2.4x (too low!)
• Dual pivot sidepulls + Dia Compe 287V drop bar V brake levers: 4.2x (even though this is larger than 4.0x, I marked this as "incompatible" because the braking on the hoods is still lower than 4.0x)
• Dual pivot sidepulls + Tektro RL520 drop bar V brake levers: 3.5x
• Dual pivot sidepulls + cheap Shimano flat bar V brake levers: 2.6x

So, it is important to use V brake levers for V brakes and to use traditional levers for cantilevers / sidepulls. By making the V brake arms shorter, the mechanical advantage of V brakes can be reduced, but with standard frame stud locations, it is impossible to have low enough mechanical advantage (for traditional levers to be usable) and enough tire clearance. Of course frame makers can play tricks by moving the studs lower, so that the vertical pivot-to-shoe distance is increased and then the mechanical advantage of "road" V-brakes (such as BR-R353) can be made so low that they can in a pinch be used with traditional drop bar levers. Still, it's not ideal to use V brakes with traditional drop bar levers, as the mechanical advantage of the entire system is very high even if the frame maker has played those tricks.

• Is it possible to guesstimate these numbers based on the distance the fingers travel divided by the distance the brake pad travels? As opposed to separately working out the ratio of the lever and the brake mechanism? Obviously that wouldn't be as useful for comparing models of brake levers, but it might have some value as a fast way of comparing different bicycles. Sep 8, 2020 at 17:36
• @DavidW Yes, definitely it is possible. However, brake pads move only very little so the error in measurement can be large. The best way is to set the brake pads to a certain known distance from the rim, and then mechanical advantage is hand_lever_movement_at_fingers / pad_movement, where hand_lever_movement_at_fingers is measured at the finger location, from rest to where the pads barely touch the rim. However, it's not reasonable to measure pad_movement to be more accurate than 0.25 mm or so, and this can cause some error. Sep 8, 2020 at 17:49
• Oh and here pad_movement should include movement of BOTH pads. So if one pad moves by 3mm and the other by 3mm, the pad_movement is 6mm. This makes the error to be about 0.5mm, not about 0.25mm as I previously stated. Sep 8, 2020 at 17:50
• For the cantilever brake did you considered the 'yoke angle'? For some pictures that I have seen for BR-C550, it seems like (P-C distance)/(Vertical P-S distance) is about 1.5, Anchor angle is about 90 degrees, And the yoke angle is about 45 degrees so I think the final mechanical advantage should be about 2.1(=1.5 × sin90° x 1/sin45°)
– Abcd
Jul 2, 2023 at 2:20
• Yes, I considered all aspects including yoke angle. In fact, I also considered how the angles and distances of the brake change as the pad moves towards the rim. However, with different length link wires you get different mechanical advantage, and frames and forks differ in the horizontal separation of brake posts and vertical post-to-pad distance. Jul 2, 2023 at 9:50