I have an electric road bike with disc brakes. Its stock front and rear tires have only 28 spokes and a slightly deeper than ordinary rim. The hubs are cheap non-Shimano hubs, but their flange diameter is the same as for Shimano FH/HB-R7070 hubs, i.e. 44mm.

After about 100 kilometers of riding, I noticed the front wheel became wobbly and had lost all of its spoke tension. The rear had some slack spokes, but only some. Now I have replaced the wheels with 36-spoke wheels.

The frame is a Cannondale AI (asymmetric integration) frame so the rear wheel dish is reduced by 6mm.

Usually I have understood that rear wheels have more problems than front wheels, but in this case it clearly was the front that was having problems. Why is this the case?

  • 4
    I’m voting to close this question because it seems to have been created just so that the OP can post a long answer that is not of much use to other users of the site. Sep 20, 2020 at 10:37
  • @ArgentiApparatus I do not think that is a valid reason to close the question. However, there does not seem to be enough information in the question for other people to diagnose anything. I very much doubt that the number of spokes is insufficient. My 32 spoke gravel wheels did not need any truing after 5k km and much abuse in hard terrain with roots, large stones, curbs and similar. Sep 20, 2020 at 15:35
  • 1
    I always wonder whether this user actually owns and rides a bike or whether the self-answered questions are merely a reason to went rants and opinions.
    – Carel
    Sep 20, 2020 at 18:55
  • @Carel There are some other excellent answers from OP, but the simulation and numbers focus of this question seems to not coincide with the "real-world problems" as mentioned in the tour. There isn't a Simulation.SE - the nearest I could find is stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/simulation which is more on the coding side.
    – Criggie
    Sep 22, 2020 at 0:47

2 Answers 2


I would say that your wheels were not initially tensioned properly. The load-unload cycle of riding will work to back off the tension on spokes that aren't tight enough.

That you have disk brakes isn't the root cause, though the forces of disks braking act through the spokes whereas rim brakes are already acting directly on the rims. So braking with disk brakes is stressing the spokes the other way, perhaps doubling the load/unload cycle count for the time you're actively braking.

When the wheel is built, the tension should "preload" each spoke sufficiently that it doesn't stretch as much during riding. If the spoke tension is low but equal, then that will eventually lead to problems, often breaking at the J-bend.


The cause is the disc brake braking torque. A wheel having a reduced number of spokes should have larger-flange hubs to withstand torque more efficiently and a stiffer rim to withstand radial loads more efficiently.

This wheel lacks the large-flange hub. This rim also is only very slightly stiffer than my DT Swiss TK 540 replacement rims with 36 spoke holes.

I estimated based on the dimension and cross sectional view of the TK 540 rim that its second moment of area is 3283 mm4. I also estimated that the slightly deeper 28-hole rim has a second moment of area of about 4500 mm4 (this is only very approximate as I do not have a cross sectional view of the no-brand rim). In comparison, Mavic MA2 second moment of area is according to my calculations 1388 mm4.

My bicycle wheel tension simulator shows that the 28-hole wheels have 38% of radial load on one spoke, that the 36-hole TK 540 wheels have 30% of radial load on one spoke and that Mavic MA2 wheels have 39% of radial load on one spoke. Thus the TK 540 wheels better withstand radial load than the others.

We also need to calculate how well a bicycle hub shaft transmits torque. My calculations show about 311 Nm per degree of twist for these hubs. Braking torque for 111 kg rider + 20 kg bicycle at 0.6 g deceleration is 261.02 Nm.

The 28-spoke wheels with their 1-cross spoke pattern twist 0.95426 degrees (left) and 0.29978 degrees (right) to generate 157.94 Nm of torque (left) and 103.08 Nm of torque (right). The torque results in alternating tension change of 626.77 N (left) and 409.07 N (right) for the spoking pattern.

This 626.77 N braking tension change can be combined with the fact that when braking hard on the front brake, all of the 131 kg weight is on the front wheel so there's 1285.1 N of load that reduces the tension of one spoke by 491 N. Thus there's about 1118 N of tension loss on the worst-affected spoke, so clearly there is no safety margin in these 28-spoke wheels if the rider is heavy and brakes hard.

This can be compared with 36-spoke TK540 wheels that twist 0.72795 degrees (left) and 0.25080 degrees (right) to generate 165.43 Nm of torque (left) and 95.584 Nm of torque (right). The torque results in alternating tension change of 465.59 N (left) and 269.01 N (right) for the spoking pattern.

This 466 N tension change is added to the 384 N tension loss in largest load-carrying spoke. Thus the worst-affected spoke has 850 N tension change. This can be combined with typical spoke tension of 1200 N, so with these 36-spoke wheels there actually is some safety margin, albeit small.

The conclusion is that when selecting hubs for disc brake front wheels, best hubs have (1) lots of spokes and (2) large flange. It also helps to have a stiff shaft like these hubs do. Disc brake front rims should be of high quality so that even spoke tension can be achieved, and the spokes need to be evenly tensioned to high tensions.

The rear disc brake in comparison provides minimal forces and is rarely used, so it is not a problem, especially considering that the Cannondale AI frame achieves even spoke tension in the rear.

  • 1
    So you post a "question" only to answer your question in a very long winded explanation.
    – P. Barney
    Sep 20, 2020 at 15:36
  • 2
    The same procedure as each time for this 'user'.
    – Carel
    Sep 20, 2020 at 18:52
  • Following the train of thought on disc brakes being the cause of loosening the spokes the same should be caused by coaster brakes (perused in Germany), drum-brakes and ... chain-pull. As all of these stress the hub-spoke-rim system.
    – Carel
    Sep 22, 2020 at 7:41
  • Coaster brakes are rear wheel brakes so they have insignificant torque. Drum brakes are inefficient brakes so they have insignificant torque. A rider cannot produce as much propulsion torque as he can braking torque with the front disc brake. Thus, pedaling torque is insignificant and not a problem. But front disc braking torque remains a problem.
    – juhist
    Sep 22, 2020 at 17:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.