There are various sizes and shapes of (pedalled as opposed to electric) unicycles.

It is possible to buy them with large wheels, supposedly for road use.

enter image description here

Image still sourced from


I imagine that the lack of a freewheel mechanism, having to brake by back pressure and the effort of balancing mean that they are inefficient and require constant effort. Also there are no gears for going up or down hills.

Does travelling by unicycle have any advantages over walking as a mode of transport? Would level city roads be most suitable? Does it ever become easy and/or completely subconscious with practice?

  • 1
    Many of those points applies to fixies too, and I don't suppose you'd doubt that they're more efficient than walking. But +1 anyway, I'd like to see the numbers too
    – Chris H
    Commented Nov 20, 2020 at 14:52
  • 2
    Letting the pedals turn your legs is a strange experience and not one I honestly recommend. E.g. I relaxed when I couldn't maintain spinning at 140rpm and was all over the road, but didn't come off. If you stick your legs out you'd better have good brakes from the bars, because you're not getting your feet back on the pedals at any decent rpm. And hand-operated brakes are possible (useful on road, not present on the track).
    – Chris H
    Commented Nov 20, 2020 at 15:14
  • 3
    How do you define and measure "efficiency" ? wattage required for a forward speed? A Unicycle is about the least aerodynamic body position possible.
    – Criggie
    Commented Nov 21, 2020 at 3:47
  • 8
    A rule of thumb is that the energy needed for walking or running on flat firm ground is about 1 kcal/kg/km. We know how to estimate the power needed to move a wheeled vehicle on flat firm ground, but there is some variation in both metabolic efficiency and in walking/running economy. That said, it appears experienced unicyclists can travel faster farther for longer periods of time than hikers carrying a backpack with equivalent loads.
    – R. Chung
    Commented Nov 21, 2020 at 15:04
  • 1
    Maybe you should ask Ed Pratt this question! Commented Nov 22, 2020 at 20:15

4 Answers 4


With a competent rider, a unicycle is far more efficient than walking. As evidence of that consider for example:

These feats are all well beyond anything anyone could complete on foot.

For comparison

  • 24 hour walk (on a track) 216.621km by Claudio Sterpin (Italy) on 19 Oct 1986 in Milan
  • 24 hours walk (on the road) 228.930km by Jesse Casteneda (USA) 19 Sep 1976 in Albuquerque
  • 1 hour walk 15,577 metres by Bernardo Segura (Mexico) 7 May 1994 in Fana

  • 24 hour ride (indoor track) 941.872 km by Christoph Strasser (Austria) 14–15 October 2017 in Switzerland
  • 24 hour ride (road) 915.39 km by Ralph Diseviscourt (Luxembourg) 11 July 2020 in Luxembourg
  • 1 hour ride (track) 55.089 km by Victor Campenaerts (Belgium) 16 April 2019 in Mexico
  • Record time in Karopoti MTB 2:07:57 by Anton Cooper from Woodend, New Zealand in 2014.

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cycling_records#24_Hours_record and http://www.karapoti.co.nz/files/3915/8322/1936/20_Fastest_Karapotis_03.03.20.pdf no times found for walking the route.

It appears that in terms of distance-covered-in-time, or time-to-cover-distance, unicycling is very approximately twice as efficient as walking and half as efficient as bicycling.

  • 1
    They are also well beyond anything that nearly all of the people on earth could complete on unicycle.
    – Paul H
    Commented Nov 23, 2020 at 6:28
  • 2
    @PaulH there's a big difference between possible for one person (presumably with others coming close) and impossible for absolutely everyone. The 24h running record is about 300km, for example
    – Chris H
    Commented Nov 23, 2020 at 8:34
  • 1
    My point is that OP seems to be 1) considering using a unicycle as transport and 2) unfamiliar with unicycling. So for the OP's purpose, no, unicycling is not efficient.
    – Paul H
    Commented Nov 23, 2020 at 9:07
  • 1
    @ChrisStratton I don't think you remove the skills aspect from consideration. I remember back in my early days mountain biking when I had a 0.5-mi climb that was about 9% average gradient. No big deal as you should be able to sit up and spin, right? Well the entire climb was covered in a spiderweb of wet roots. My skilled buddy danced over the roots effortlessly. For me, making any progress on the bike was an exhausting full body workout. Walking was more efficient.
    – Paul H
    Commented Nov 24, 2020 at 15:43
  • 1
    With @Criggie 's edits - it appears that in terms of distance-covered-in-time, or time-to-cover-distance, unicycling is very approximately twice as efficient as walking and half as efficient as bicycling.
    – Penguino
    Commented Nov 24, 2020 at 23:50

For a skilled rider in reasonable terrain, the efficiency of a unicyle is not that different from a bike, and drastically higher than walking.

The bicycle is popularly regarded as the most efficient means of human powered transit. Basically you sit there, use a smooth rotational movement, and mechanical advantage sends you sailing easily along, wasting no effort in vertical movement or pavement impact. As speeds increase, the largest energy expenditure on a bike rapidly becomes fighting air resistance, which is why drafting is a thing.

For a skilled rider, a large wheel unicycle is not very different from riding a bike. Yes, there is a foward and backward component to balance, but just as in the skill of walking, this is not done by loosing control and then recovering it, but rather by adaptively putting just a tiny bit more or less effort into the pedals - effort that all contributes to useful progress over the ground anyway. In fact, if a unicyclist does actually start to fall over (essentially always falling forward) the "save" is a mad burst of pedaling - effort expended at an inefficient rate, but still ultimately going towards covering ground.

Typical cruising speed when riding the largest current production pneumatic tire (36 inch) direct drive is around 16-20 km/hr. If one were to equip a cruiser bike with the same low gearing and short cranks, the efficiency would be effectively the same. Put the ordinary sprockets back on the bike, and now a bicyclist riding alongside the unicyclist at the same pace can pedal more slowly and gain a small advantage there, but the actual power output to roll the same speed will be about the same. The thing is, a bicyclist of comparable enthusiasm to someone able to ride a unicycle smoothly is probably not going to be content to roll along at 20 km/hr, but rather will go a bit faster. However, this does not make them more efficient - actually the opposite. Because energy expended fighting air resistance increases rapidly with speed and overwhelmingly dominates at higher cycling speeds, the reality is that someone rolling along at an easy pace on a unicycle is actually moving more efficiently than the person who passes them going twice as fast on a road bike. A bicyclist going just a little bit faster could be more efficient that the best unicyclist, but the bicyclist would have to chose to actually ride at their most efficient speed, rather than be guided by more typical desires to get somewhere or get in a workout before they get tired of the saddle.

To look at some specific situations:

  • What about coasting? While exceptions exist, unicycles are conventionally fixed gear. However, "following through" while the wheel moves the rider's legs requires little effort. There's probably a small loss of efficiency compared to a bike in terrain of gradual 1% up and down. Really though the main issue with being unable to coast is being unable to simply stand out of the saddle to get a break from its pressure - it is possible to stand for a half minute while pedaling (much easier if a narrow handlebar is fitted) but it requires quite a bit more work than to stand while coasting.

  • What about climbing? To some extent, the "gearing" of a unicycle is already optimized for gentle climbs, so that's a place we often pass casual bicyclists. Steeper hills can become a challenge leading to a decision to walk instead. It's not that the unicycle is less efficient than walking, but rather that one may simply not have the power output available to climb at the roughly 9 km/hr below which it becomes a challenge to keep a unicycle stable, but be quite able to hike up the incline at 3-4 km/hr on foot.

  • Descending hills. For moderate descents work can be done to resist the wheel, but a brake can also be fitted. I had an extended descent the other day where I actually had to take a rest break - not for my legs, but because my brake hand was getting tired.

  • What about obstacles? Reasonable dirt and gravel surfaces, etc are readily covered on a unicycle, and there is a whole discipline of mountain unicycling devoted to tackling technical mountain bike trails, "trials" involving vertical bunny hops onto stack of shipping pallets or stair railings, etc. Often the appeal here is the challenge not the efficiency, though for things not beyond the unicyclist's capability something like a fire road would be more efficiently ridden than hiked. And switching between riding and walking can be a great way to cover ground as each provides some break from the particular fatigues of the other.

  • Stop and go traffic, tight turns. To someone who can idle (trackstand) on a unicycle, this may not be a big deal; to others, constantly stopping and remounting could indeed be an efficiency loss. I might chose to walk rather than ride a neighborhood trip if I knew I'd have to stop three times in a mile, but the reality is every time I do, the first time someone passes on a bike I realize that even with this annoyance, it would have been faster and more efficient to ride my unicycle.

  • Carrying things. I've done meaningful grocery shopping 8 km away using a backpack and a unicycle, but realistically for short distances one can carry more on foot, and for long ones bicycle panniers or even a trailer are going to have more capacity and exert less toll on the body.

One should be careful of mistaking things like endurance or range for efficiency, but there are of course some relationships. A bicyclist may often be able to readily access their entire ability to output energy over a day. In contrast, someone hiking may experience fatigue, but may find their range more limited by things like impact stress. Riding a unicycle tends to fall somewhere in between. Riding smoothly presents almost no impact stress, though jumping on and off frequently definitely can. Saddles tend to be larger than those on a bike, and out of saddle breaks more limited, so saddle-related fatigue can be more of an issue, particularly for a developing rider (a chamois and anti-friction cream are definitely recommended, along with a handlebar with permits a more bike-like limitation of saddle contact to sit bone pressure and not thigh control).

Ultimately an only moderately-active individual who invests effort in learning to ride smoothly, remount without support, and climb moderate hills can probably do dawn-to-dusk "Century" (100 mile or 160 km) rides, while likely challenged to hike even a third that far. Experience doing these confirms that rolling along spinning high cadence into negligible resistance is a moderately low effort way to spend an "active" day. Someone on a bike might get it done in half the time, but at the actual expenditure of more energy.


Unicycling has so many obvious disadvantages over walking. Unicycles require lots of practice and they cannot easily traverse uneven ground like stairs or sand. Additionally, the "having to brake by back pressure" effect means that unicycling down a slope is approximately just as tiring as unicycling up the same slope. However, a unicyclist on flat solid ground is generally faster and more energy efficient than walking. The large wheel primarily aims to increase the max-speed of the unicycle.

However unicycles (and unicyclists) come in a variety of different shapes and sizes so there are many exceptions. For example giraffe unicycles may be less efficient because of the resistance in the chain and the energy spent mounting and unmounting it. Some unicycles have gearing systems (like the "Schlumpf") which are known to increase the max-speed of a unicycle, can be less energy efficient due to all the moving parts. Some particularly talented unicyclists are able to lift both their feet from the pedals as they ride down a hill - letting the pedals spin freely underneath them as they freewheel down the slope. This technique is more efficient and faster than normal unicycling because the speed is no longer limited by the cadence of the unicyclist.

Another advantage that unicycling has a form of transportation is safety. Pedestrians and motor vehicles naturally give me significantly more space when I am riding my unicycle. Presumably this is because unicyclists look very unstable and unpredictable to anyone unfamiliar with the way unicycles move.

  • The space-afforded an unusual cycle is definitely true - while riding on my Recumbent, I routinely see traffic moving to the other side of the road to go around me, when I'm in exactly the same position as on a common road bike where they give far less space. Welcome to SE - great first answer!
    – Criggie
    Commented Nov 22, 2020 at 21:42

In my experience a unicycle is not as efficient as walking.
On a bicycle you keep balance by leaning a bit to the left/right or by making small steering adjustments left/right to keep from tipping over. These are typically tiny adjustments don't slow you down much.

To keep balance on a unicycle you make the same left/right adjustments but on top of that you have keep from falling forward or backward. Keeping balance in that new axis means constantly accelerating/decelerating. This is the main difference. If you have excellent balance you do this mostly through leaning your body forward/backward but there will always be some extra effort put into acceleration/deceleration that has nothing to do with maintaining speed but everything to do with maintaining balance.
I don't think I could ever relax my legs for more than 2 seconds before having to correct my balance.

Even at "rest" you still have to constantly rock the unicycle back and forth a few inches to keep from falling over. Your legs are always working when riding a unicycle and there is no way to go idle or rest until you dismount.
I learned to ride on a small unicycle as a child and maybe things would be different if I had a better sized unicycle or a superior sense of balance. But in my experience my legs would always get fatigued after 20 or so minutes of riding a unicycle.
Maintaining a slow or fast speed had no impact. It was the constant acceleration and deceleration needed to keep myself upright that took the most out of me.

Going down even the slightest hill meant I had to work harder because I was constantly trying to slow myself down by backpedaling at just the right amount. The answer might be different from someone with better balance but I don't know anyone else who has a unicycle much less rides one.

  • 7
    This answer appears to compare unicycling with bicycling, not walking. If you've ever worked with persons recovering from an injury (like a stroke or an amputation) you'd see that in walking they also have to make balance adjustments. In addition, it appears that experienced unicyclists can travel farther, faster, for longer periods of time than hikers carrying equivalent loads.
    – R. Chung
    Commented Nov 21, 2020 at 15:09
  • 5
    it seems to me very obvious that a unicycle would be much more efficient than walking, since to cycle on a bicycle at say 10mph requires very little power output on a flat, smooth road, whereas to run at 10mph requires a large power output. A unicycle is functionally much more like cycling in that the forces can only be lost to drivetrain, tyre friction, and air resistance, with air resistance not being too large at 10mph, and there being no obvious reason why the rolling resistance should be vastly higher with a larger wheel
    – thelawnet
    Commented Nov 22, 2020 at 7:57
  • You write from the perspective of a relatively inexperienced rider. What you are failing to take into consideration is that forward backward balance on a unicycle works exactly the same way it does when walking - sure, you could overbalance and check, but when actually walking along you propel yourself smoothly at the speed which precisely carries you over each foot in turn. Similarly, an experienced rider on a unicycle just gives the wheel the slight effort it needs to keep going at a nice comfortable pace. Commented Nov 24, 2020 at 6:18
  • Apart from infrequent mistakes, "corrections" for an experienced rider are just applying a tiny bit more or less of the very effort that is productive to covering ground anyway, so there's no real waste to "balance" once one can ride smoothly. Sure, there's the occasional jogger out there who requires a slight effort to pass on a 36er unicycle, but they're working hard and you're just moving your feet a little faster than you might otherwise - but still putting out less power than the average determined bicyclist, as unlike a bike you're not going fast enough to fight much air resistance. Commented Nov 24, 2020 at 6:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.