When determining correct chain size, one common technique is to install the chain (without passing it through any derailleur) onto the largest front and rear sprockets. Then, determine the shortest length that the chain could be cut to, and then add 1 complete link to that length. One complete link corresponds to one inner and one outer pair, which corresponds to 1 inches.

I have noticed that in recent times, some resources recommend adding 2 links (2 inches) instead of only 1, specifically when the bicycle is set up with a single chainring in the front. This seems to be a "tribal knowledge" practice, but fairly common in my area.

Is there any evidence or data to support this practice of adding an additional link to 1X systems, and are any major component manufacturers recommending the practice?

See for example :


  • 1
    A complete link is 1” long. The pitch is 1/2” per pin.
    – MaplePanda
    Feb 3, 2021 at 18:48
  • 1
    I updated my question accordingly Feb 3, 2021 at 20:41
  • I don't think MaplePanda is correct. The big manufacturers refer to a single link as a half inch. For the same reason, we don't think of a 48tooth ring as a 24 link ring.
    – Noise
    Feb 4, 2021 at 16:52
  • 1
    But it's impossible to add a single 1/2" link to a chain. You have to add both an inner and outer link to extend the chain by one unit, unless you can add a "half link" which is used for single-speed. So we can assume any instruction to add "one link" means to add one inner and one outer link, or 1 inch total length. Feb 4, 2021 at 17:05
  • @JoeK The answer originally stated “One complete link corresponds to one inner and one outer pair, which corresponds to 2 inches”, which is definitely wrong. It’s all very confusing!
    – MaplePanda
    Feb 4, 2021 at 19:52

2 Answers 2


Regardless of the derailleur or drivetrain type in question, the purpose of a chain sizing procedure based on large/large plus one link is to find the chain size where the rear derailleur is so extended that if it were one link shorter, the frame, hanger, and/or derailleur would be destroyed.

Using that as your target chain length has different amounts of merit on 2x and 3x depending on the specifics or your application and the parts used. There is little reason to use that length with a 1x-specific RD if you have the option of making it some amount longer, which you do in most cases.

If ridden in the large/large combo, bikes tend to shift badly and operate with increased resistance from the rear derailleur if the chain is sized this way. The advantages are minimizing chain slap/derailment and saving weight, and marginally better shifting throughout the more useful part of the range (on a 2x/3x) than if the chain was a link or two longer.

Bikes with 1x specific RDs need their large cog combo to be a fully functional gear. And, extant 1x RDs all or mostly all have clutches, so chain length anywhere within the possible lengths that could work will have next to no effect on slap. Chain sizing instructions for 1x-specific RDs tend to target the length to be around the point where in the lowest gear, the center of the tension pulley is modestly ahead of directly below the guide pulley. There is some variance in that, but it will be some positioning of the lower cage that the manufacturer has chosen to perform as intended.

Bikes with non-1x RDs that are being set up 1x start to ask some questions of the mechanic, and the answer will be different depending on the parts and application in question. That could be either someone setting up a parts-minimal 1x commuter or it could be a cyclocross or DH/freeride bike from before clutches and the mainstreaming of 1x. Generally speaking, aside from slap/derailment concerns, that kind of drivetrain is set up to have the longest chain possible that still allows the chain to be tensioned in small/small, but slap/derailment can and often will cause you to shorten it from there depending on the application, to the point where more rough stuff bikes with that kind of drivetrain would often have the RD extend pretty far forward in large/large, i.e. something pretty close to the large/large +1 method. Chain length sometimes requires tuning on that sort of bike in real life regardless of what any manufacturer instructions say.


Current gen Shimano mountain rear derailleurs (dealers' manual) require at least that much chain by their own instructions: 4 to 5 links plus quick link for hard tails and 5 to six links plus quick link for full suspension bikes. Note that Shimano refers to 1/2" section as a link, as is quite common.

I recently set up a chain on a 1x full suspension with RD-M5100 with the 'standard' method, following the instructions from the Shimano MTB chain manual and the chain was much too short putting the derailleur in a peculiar position in all gears and not enough to wrap around the larger cogs, it was unworkable. Following the instructions in the derailleur manual instead, with 5 links plus quick link gave the expected result.

  • In this case, the amount of "extra" chain is a function of the derailleur used, and not presence or absence of multiple front sprockets. We would agree that these derailleurs require the same amount of "extra" chain, even if they were being used on a 2X system? Would running 2X vs. 1X make any difference? Feb 3, 2021 at 20:34
  • @BetterSense yep good point, in the instructions, the chain goes around the 'largest chainring' so not limited to 1x in that sense. however current RDs are based around the large capacity rear cassettes which go hand-in-glove with 1x set ups. RD-M5100 has max front difference of 0T so not intended for use on 2x
    – Swifty
    Feb 3, 2021 at 21:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.