A while ago, I started buying and fixing used bikes and parts.

As a result, I have quite a large number of old individual wheels lying around, most of them with bearings that are no longer good. Since it's typically the cones that give out first (by design, if I understand correctly), one could of course replace the cones. Those do cost a bit, though. But most of all, I like repairing things whenever I can, rather than replacing them.

So here's my question: Would it be possible and sensible to machine the bearing race of the cone, rather than replacing the cone?

I assume that 0.1 or 0.2mm (up to 8 thousands of an inch) should do to get a nice surface, and that this should not be a problem for the overall geometry.
Would you say that is about correct, or am I overlooking something?

  • I would first consider using some sort of abrasive approach. Commented Jul 28, 2022 at 21:06
  • 4
    I have cones and a lathe - might give this a try.
    – Criggie
    Commented Jul 29, 2022 at 1:08
  • i'm really looking forward to your findings, @Criggie !
    – Burki
    Commented Aug 1, 2022 at 20:35

1 Answer 1


The surfaces of cones are hardened, so you're not going to be able to do it on a lathe with typical tools (maybe with tungsten carbide tools). However people do grind cones to resurface them, finishing with a polish. The link describes locking the cone onto an axle and putting it in a drill press (a lathe would also work) then running an grinder or large dremel with an abrasive disc or cone. In some cases a thin hard layer is removed and they then wear fast, but others are hard enough below the surface to work well.

  • 3
    Many recent Shimano cones are coated with a layer of cubic boron nitride. If resurfacing, this layer won't be there anymore, and thus you can't expect to get a good wear life out of it.
    – juhist
    Commented Jul 28, 2022 at 15:35
  • @juhist it's interesting that while Shimano's designs seem quite traditional, their materials aren't. It's also interesting that these (presumably expensive) cones, like cheap surface-hardened ones, won't resurface well, while others are hardened throughout (or at least deeper). I'm not sure how a thin layer of cubic boron nitride would grind, but in bulk it would be a chore. Hopefully the OP is fixing up quite old stuff
    – Chris H
    Commented Jul 28, 2022 at 15:44
  • I suspect the reason for using cubic boron nitride is that today QR axles are gone and it's all thru-axle. Shimano's cup and cone design require a separate axle around the 12mm thru-axle, and the cassette freehub sets a limit to the outside diameter of the bearing. Hence you can't anymore use 1/4" bearing balls as used to be customary for rear, and can't use 3/16" as the next best size after 1/4", but have to go all the way to 5/32". The surface pressure on those 5/32" balls is terrible, and would probably wear out normal cones quite fast.
    – juhist
    Commented Jul 28, 2022 at 16:47
  • 1
    @juhist all my bikes are QR or use old fashioned nuts, so I've never worked on a thru axle hub. It doesn't sound good
    – Chris H
    Commented Jul 28, 2022 at 18:26
  • 1
    Thank you, and thank you for the link. i'll give it a try then. I can always throw them away if it doen't work out.
    – Burki
    Commented Aug 1, 2022 at 6:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.