I have a frameset with 12mm thru-axles front and rear (non-boost). I think bikes like that are now very common in road/gravel realm. I am building myself a second pair of wheels at the moment.

While rear hubs are available for both 12mm and 15mm axles, it appears that hub manufacturers almost exclusively produce front hubs for 15mm thru-axles. 12mm thru-axle hubs exist, but are very hard to find and source (at least here in UK)

There are two ways to convert 15mm thru-axle hub to match 12mm axle:

  • Swap end caps (usually offered by hub manufacturers like DT)
  • Use an adapter sleeve around the axle


What are the pros and cons of each option above (end caps vs adapter sleeve)? Both theoretical and practical. Does one of the options make a stiffer system? Is one of these more likely to creak?

Bonus questions

  • Do you know why there appears to be lack of 12mm front hubs on the market?
  • I have seen some 12mm front hubs, but always wondered are those just 15mm hubs with 12mm end caps fitted. Anyone had experience with these?

1 Answer 1


Model-specific endcaps are always the superior solution. If they exist for a given hub, you know they will work. Universal adapters that do this threaten to be gimmick products. There's nothing that says a given 12mm fork will have a flat surface on the dropouts sufficient to pair with a 15mm hub. In a lot of cases it may be fine, but it's not a given. You've also got a spare thing in play during wheel changes. The exact length of the tubular sleeve can't be any longer than the hub OLD or else it can be dangerous, and any shorter and it can rattle. There's just not a lot of good reasons to do it that way, since in the best case it's another precision machined part to buy and all it's doing is adapting to something that's not any cheaper or more useful than getting the right hub/wheel in the first place.

Some of what you're asking gets into design elements of front hubs, and at that point the conversation is more about tradeoffs than generalities. Many 12x100 hubs can have their endcaps switched to 15x100 or QR, but not all. In general the ones that can go all the way up to 15 will be stiffer and heavier while the dedicated 12mm ones will be lighter, because the "main axle" component of the hub internals can be smaller. How much that stiffness contributes meaningfully to anything is probably pretty negligible. All else equal, dedicated implies more latitude to spec bearings that are whatever you want for your durability vs weight needs, whereas having a hub that's capable of fitting a 15mm axle and instead is wasting space endcapping down to 12mm implies you could have bigger bearings instead, or less mass somewhere. In reality it's not much of a functional concern, but it is there in the design considerations. It's unequivocal that the absolute most efficient designs are dedicated.

Though as you mention there are some geographical factors, 12x100 front hubs are common at this point. It is the main standard in use for new road bikes, and every hub and wheelset manufacturer makes them. If you're not seeing them, it's possible you're looking somewhere that's very mountain-focused.

What there isn't necessarily a large variety of to choose from is aftermarket 12x100 hubs that are readily available as hub only and below the premium price points. In other words, it's easy to buy the high end, but getting something low- to mid-price can be a little niche. Shimano often does a good job being the biggest source in that market, i.e. with the HB-RS470 or R7000 hubs in this case. (To be clear, all Shimano hubs are dedicated axle, no endcaps).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.