Timeline for Aerobar, why would carbon cost more than aluminum?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2020 at 12:08 | history | edited | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 349 characters in body
|
| Dec 17, 2020 at 1:10 | vote | accept | eugene | ||
| Dec 16, 2020 at 22:00 | comment | added | Chris H | ... Now I'm home I can see the 2 bars mentioned in the Q do indeed have quite a lot of armrest adjustment. The Supersonic come back further, but what works for a given rider will depend on the reach the bike already has, and the position they're trying to achieve. That's why I got really cheap ones to try out and figure out what I wanted - and replaced them with cheap ones again when I broke the aluminium arm pad bracket (with my head ) | |
| Dec 16, 2020 at 21:50 | history | edited | MaplePanda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed a common error with the verb “to dampen”.
|
| Dec 16, 2020 at 18:40 | comment | added | Chris H | I fall into that last category - cheap aluminium clip-ons on a touring frame for long rides (though I have tried the local TT course). All the ones I've seen have been able to go far further back than necessary; it's the forward limit that's more likely to be a constraint. The exception could be if there's a lot of adjustment on the fore-aft position of the arm pads - most just have options for how they fit to the brackets. Aluminium bars could be cut if there's a lot of wasted length. | |
| Dec 16, 2020 at 16:30 | history | answered | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |