I've heard this comment but I have not found any information about it. Is it true?
-
Depends if you consider the environmental cost when working out 'cheaper'. Carbon bikes end up in landfills. Aluminum is valuable enough most are recycled.– mattnzAug 18, 2018 at 2:18
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
Given that alloy framed bikes are generally cheaper than CF framed bikes, it's reasonable to conclude that an alloy frame is cheaper to produce than a CF one.
There are some videos on YouTube that show the basics of the process of making a CF frame. There hundreds of individually cut sections sections of CF cloth that need to be combined together in multiple steps to give the frame strength where it is needed. All the sections of CF cloth need to be combined together in moulds by hand. This is where a lot of the cost comes from.
answered Aug 17, 2018 at 21:45
It's basically untrue. Everything about carbon adds to the price. The raw materials and tooling are more expensive, the process takes longer, and the work is generally regarded as more finicky and easier for things to go wrong with, leading to a higher reject rate.
answered Aug 17, 2018 at 19:44
-
High reject rate and undefined recycling process for the rejects. stickybottle.com/latest-news/… Aug 19, 2018 at 22:23
Cheap Carbon frames may well be cheaper to build than aluminum frames, but carbon has many more failure modes that can be introduced at manufacturing, requiring much higher levels of quality control.
It possible to buy very cheap carbon components out of China, but how many of us choose to buy these? I am happy to ride a bike made from carbon parts, but but would never consider using off brand for parts I consider critical - stems, forks, bars, frame, wheels.
Happy to use cheap carbon stem spacers though.
