The road bike I'm planning on buying is only available in 49cm and 50cm. Will that be okay given that my height is 5'8/9?

  • 1
    Too small, don't do it, lower back pain, inefficient, awkward. Sep 11, 2020 at 22:18
  • Have you tried it out in person? Buying a new bike sight-unseen is a recipe for pain and a bike that won't be ridden.
    – Criggie
    Sep 11, 2020 at 22:57
  • 1
    One very important bit of information you should add is exactly how the "size" measurement is done on the bike you are considering. Commonly, size refers to the distance measured along the line of the seat tube from the bottom bracket to a point in space where the top tube would meet the line if the top tube were horizontal. But some bikes will measure to the point where the actual sloping top tube meets the seat tube, so the "size" is much smaller for a given bike. Thus 49 and 50 may be sizes comparable to a typical 54 or so.
    – Andrew
    Sep 13, 2020 at 11:24
  • In the end it’s all about stack and reach, the size (whether in virtual seatpost height or S/M/L etc.) is meaningless.
    – Michael
    Sep 13, 2020 at 16:03

2 Answers 2


Very unlikely a 50cm (small?) bike will fit you. I'm about the same height and fit a 54/medium in most road bike models.

Some people about the same height with short legs fit a 52cm frame with a long stem fitted.

The manufacturer of the bike you are looking at should have a sizing guide that takes height and inseam measurements into account.

Don't compromise on bike size, get the bike you want that fits you. A frame that is much too small will be a pain to ride.

  • 2
    A frame that is much too small will be a pain to ride. Literally. Sep 11, 2020 at 14:00
  • 2
    This, definitely. 50cm is a child's bike - my seven year old rides that. Can't imagine riding it as a road bike as an adult (as opposed to a trick, BMX bike).
    – Joe
    Sep 11, 2020 at 22:43
  • @Joe: 50cm frame height can easily be the right size for a 165cm woman. That’s not a child.
    – Michael
    Sep 13, 2020 at 8:13
  • With a long stem it could work. A 140mm stem adds 5cm of reach compared to a default 90mm stem. That’s like going from a size XS to M. If the frame has a lot of reach to begin with it can work just fine.
    – Michael
    Sep 13, 2020 at 8:16
  • @Michael A long stem will adjust reach, but there are other issues: the seatpost may not be long enough and toe-front wheel interference may be excessive due to too-short wheelbase Sep 13, 2020 at 14:39

While it's likely that a 50 cm frame is smaller than you'd like (as others have said), there is one situation in which it would be what you want, and that is if you want a really aggressive aerodynamic position.

If you watch competitive cyclists, you will see that they generally position their handlebars quite a bit below the saddle height, especially for events where aerodynamics are very important such as time trials and draft-illegal du/triathlons.

If you are interested in having a very aerodynamic position with a large saddle to bar drop, you will need a bike with a short "stack", and a 50 cm might be about right for you. It depends somewhat on how long your legs are for your height.

That said, even pros often find aggressive aero positions uncomfortable to ride for long periods of time, and just getting into such a position requires that you be pretty flexible, so I wouldn't recommend it if you are just getting into road biking for the first time.

For reference, I'm a short-legged 5'6" and have regularly ridden frames as small as 47 cm, but for a comfortable touring bike (almost zero saddle to bar drop) I ride a 53-54 cm.

  • Agreed - note in OP's other question they've asked about an entry level bike, so getting riding is more likely than getting very aero.
    – Criggie
    Sep 13, 2020 at 1:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.