It has already been established that most of braking power comes from front brake. Now, several times that I have been replacing brake pads on my commuter cyclocross bike I have noticed that rear pads are worn out but front still have some rubber in them. Does this happen to anyone else, and why would this happen? The brakes are Shimano cantilevers, previously I had no-brand min-V's that did the same.

  • Are you riding in conditions where you use the rear brake a lot more than the front brake (e.g. snow)?
    – Batman
    Sep 12 '15 at 16:29
  • I changed the title slightly as this is specific to the OP.
    – RoboKaren
    Sep 12 '15 at 16:40
  • @Batman not really, just some wet gravel paths. Chris H's answer seems sensible to me.
    – ojs
    Sep 12 '15 at 17:07
  • Most of the braking power comes from the wheel where you do most of the braking. This rule is only broken if a tire is skidding rather than maintaining solid contact with the road. Sep 12 '15 at 18:12
  • ...and, given that the cyclist does know what they are doing and not counting some special situations, it is the front brake.
    – ojs
    Sep 12 '15 at 18:14

There are a couple of factors that might come into play.

The first is that you may be braking more than you think at the back. Which brake is controlled by your stronger hand? Are they adjusted the same?

The second factor is dirt. The front wheel throws up dust and muddy water, some of which can reach the back wheel even with mudguards. This can abrade both the pads and the rims. This will be much reduced on disk brakes.

If you use the brakes a lot downhill you may find yourself using the back lightly to stop yourself accelerating. This seems to cause quite a lot of wear, perhaps because the brakes don't remove the dirt like they would in a hard stop and perhaps because it's a lot of wheel revs with the brake touching the rims.

I used to notice this on stock pads and the cheap dual compounds I first replaced them with. The KoolStop pads I now use wear much less and I don't notice a difference. This is on ordinary shimano V brakes. This was despite only taking up the slack in the back brake when coming to a hard stop, but I had a couple of steep downhills.

  • 1
    I would add that the use of the rear brake to slow down (in any situation) wears down the pad faster than using the front to stop since it will rub longer on the rim.
    – Bibz
    Sep 12 '15 at 19:11
  • @Bibz that's a good point, though it's also used with lower contact pressure which will go some way to offsetting the extra wear. I'm sure wear vs. pressure isn't linear; wear vs. total distance moved over the surface probably is.
    – Chris H
    Sep 12 '15 at 19:46
  • 1
    ChrisH very much so. Minimal contact is basically sanding the pad down, and the rest I agree with @Bibz. Plus if there's grit you can also be sanding the rim down... I killed a front rim touring once using rim brakes on a rainy day down a long gravel descent. Just enough muck in the water to help the brakes abrade the rim. Made it home, but not by much.
    – Móż
    Sep 13 '15 at 4:26

Generally, front will wear faster, for both the rim and the pads. Bicycle is a bit hard to judge because it depends on the rider's habit, brake pad's quality and surface contact, and also the rim's quality.

I can tell you that front brakes in cars need replacing more often than rear. This example is a bit more objective than bicycle since front and rear are operated by a single brake (although it depends on how the brake is setup and is still subjective).

  • I've never seen a bike with a single brake lever that actuates both front and rear. What country are you in?
    – Criggie
    Sep 13 '15 at 22:35
  • Hi Criggie, I was talking about car on the second paragraph. It is n example of how front brake wears out much faster than rear, especially on old car.
    – Nhân Lê
    Sep 13 '15 at 22:40
  • Cars generally have dual circuit brakes, so one pedal runs two distinct braking systems. There's a bias as well so that more of a car's braking effort is sent to the front circuit. However this is getting really off the subject of a cable-actuated bike brake wearing its pads.
    – Criggie
    Sep 13 '15 at 23:03
  • I dont agree, if it's new car that has bias, they usually has bigger pad and rotor as well. As you said I agree it's off topic. But I want to demonstrate that on old car, where brake and clutch still operates with cable, front wears out much faster
    – Nhân Lê
    Sep 13 '15 at 23:09

Because there is more weight on the rear because that's where you are.

  • 3
    Nope - that's tyre/tire wear. Question is specific to brake pad wear.
    – Criggie
    Dec 2 '17 at 9:43
  • 1
    We're generally looking for answers that give a decent amount of detail. I don't, personally, see how there being more weight on the rear would lead to brake pads wearing faster -- I could certainly be wrong, so could you explain why it works that way. In particular, most of the braking force comes from the front, as weight shifts forwards when you brake. Dec 4 '17 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.